2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2016.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compression behavior of simply-supported and fully embedded monolayer graphene: Theory and experiment

Abstract: Single layer graphene simply-supported on a polymer substrate was subjected to axial compression and its behavior upon loading was monitored with laser Raman spectroscopy (LRS). The graphene was found to fail by wrinkling (buckling) at a critical strain of −0.30% and at a compressive stress of ~1.6 GPa, as revealed by the conversion of the spectroscopic data to actual stress-strain curves. This contrasts with the value of -0.60% and stress of ~3.8 GPa required for failure initiation in the fully embedded case.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical strain for the initiation of wrinkling strongly depends on the magnitude of adhesion with the underline substrate and was found to be ∼−0.30% for a single layer graphene on PMMA/SU-8. 13 Herein, the form of failure of simply supported single layer graphene under compression was examined by AFM and MD simulations as well. The AFM results for a single layer graphene on a PMMA/SU-8 substrate at rest (∼0.00%) and under ∼−1.00% compressive strain are represented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The critical strain for the initiation of wrinkling strongly depends on the magnitude of adhesion with the underline substrate and was found to be ∼−0.30% for a single layer graphene on PMMA/SU-8. 13 Herein, the form of failure of simply supported single layer graphene under compression was examined by AFM and MD simulations as well. The AFM results for a single layer graphene on a PMMA/SU-8 substrate at rest (∼0.00%) and under ∼−1.00% compressive strain are represented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a simply supported or embedded graphene flake is subjected to uniaxial tension, it is in fact loaded in compression in the lateral direction due to the Poisson's shrinkage of the polymer (which is relatively larger than that of graphene). Wrinkling of supported graphene under compression has been examined in various studies, 8,[13][14][15] as well as the effect of heavy wrinkled topography present in CVD graphene to the tensile performance and the reinforcing capabilities. [16][17][18] On the other hand, little attention has been given to the formation of these instabilities under tension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K W is the Winkler's modulus, K l is the stiffness of the springs that bind the polymer to the outer layer, K gr is the stiffness of the springs that bond the individual graphene layers to each other with unit of Pa/m, and n is the number of layers of the few layer graphene. The stiffness of the springs that connect the outer graphene layer to the polymer is taken to be K 1 =3 GPa/nm based on experiments of simply supported mono-layer [19].…”
Section: Spring-in-seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, in the case of perfectly flat bands and a constant ∆ FB we have the result [10] In the flat band regime the ratio tends approximately to a constant as in Eq. (33). and in TBG [14] within the same interaction model k B T c ≈ 0.25 max ∆(T = 0).…”
Section: B Critical Doping Level and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%