2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressible Navier–Stokes analysis of an oscillating wing in a power-extraction regime using efficient low-speed preconditioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the TD-counterpart of the steady smoother (7) is: In this study, the strongly coupled turbulent LSP approach for two-equation turbulence models was developed following the steps outlined in [6], but the 225 inviscid/viscous laminar kernel of the new turbulent preconditioner is that proposed by Weiss and Smith [16]. That preconditioner was previously successfully used for solving steady/unsteady inviscid and viscous laminar flows with the COSA code [7,33,2], and the turbulent preconditioner presented below was used for the analyses of [1]. 230…”
Section: Integration Of Time-dependent Equations 190mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the TD-counterpart of the steady smoother (7) is: In this study, the strongly coupled turbulent LSP approach for two-equation turbulence models was developed following the steps outlined in [6], but the 225 inviscid/viscous laminar kernel of the new turbulent preconditioner is that proposed by Weiss and Smith [16]. That preconditioner was previously successfully used for solving steady/unsteady inviscid and viscous laminar flows with the COSA code [7,33,2], and the turbulent preconditioner presented below was used for the analyses of [1]. 230…”
Section: Integration Of Time-dependent Equations 190mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these problem types, the choice of a density-based CFD solver is also very well suited [1]. However, the solution accuracy of these codes decreases in the presence of low-speed flow regions where the local Mach number drops below the threshold of 0.1 [2]. This is due primarily to improper scaling of 15 the numerical dissipation components as the local Mach number tends to zero (incompressible flow limit) [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The test work in a wind tunnel by McKinney and DeLaurier [3] showed that the energy extraction efficiency was comparable to that of wind turbines. Extensive work related to energy extraction performance of oscillating foils can also be found in the study by Shimizu et al [4], Platzer et al [5], Zhu [6], Campobasso and Drofelnik [7,8], and Yu and Wang [9]. In their work sinusoidal flapping motions are usually used, and the effect of kinematic parameters (plunging and pitching amplitudes, oscillating frequency, and phase angle between pitching and plunging motions) and the corresponding flow evolutions are systematically investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The numerical results, obtained using = = 5 × 10 −3 and = 1 × 10 −3 , are then compared to the force predictions presented by [15,16]. The force coefficients , , and the moment coefficients , are presented in Figure 8.…”
Section: Validation Of Force Calculations Through An Oscillatingmentioning
confidence: 99%