2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-1831-4_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compressibility Characteristics of Guar Gum-Treated Expansive Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the biopolymer-amended samples followed the same trend as the unamended soil and showed closely matching values for C c (0.31 ± 0.02) and C s (0.08 ± 0.01). These ranges are similar to those observed by [29][30][31]55] and indicate that the effect of the biopolymer amendment on the consolidation parameters of the investigated expansive soil is negligible. This is because loading cancels the effect of the void ratio increase irrespective of the singular or dual porosity of the soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of the biopolymer-amended samples followed the same trend as the unamended soil and showed closely matching values for C c (0.31 ± 0.02) and C s (0.08 ± 0.01). These ranges are similar to those observed by [29][30][31]55] and indicate that the effect of the biopolymer amendment on the consolidation parameters of the investigated expansive soil is negligible. This is because loading cancels the effect of the void ratio increase irrespective of the singular or dual porosity of the soil.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, k s is also reported to increase for highly plastic clay from Hong Kong by one order of magnitude (from 1.2 × 10 −9 m/s to 1.3 × 10 −8 m/s) for 20% anionic biochar [28]. In a similar way, the compression index (C c ) and the swell index (C s ) have shown changes for lean clays (Shanghai, China, and Warangal, India) by ±0.06 and ±0.04 when amended with 0.5-4% charge-neutral guar gum as well as anionic xanthan gum and a 1-4% mixture of anionic carrageenan and charge-neutral casein, respectively [29][30][31]. These improvements are material-specific and as such should be extended to the local expansive soil that severely affects the construction and maintenance of civil infrastructure in the region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It was concluded in Taguchi analysis that CMC had better performance in comparison with xanthan gum and guar gum and has a promising potential as an alternative material for dust control. 10) (Vydehi & Moghal, 2022) In this study, experiments were performed for the stabilisation of lean clay collected from the NIT Warangal campus with Guar Gum biopolymer at varying dosages of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0% and 2.5% by dry weight of soil. It was observed that with the increase in dosage of GG, liquid limit and plasticity index values increased and it was attributed to increase in viscosity of the solution of biopolymer.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%