2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03747-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive versus standard care in post-severe acute kidney injury survivors, a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background Currently, there is a lack of evidence to guide optimal care for acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. Therefore, post-discharge care by a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) may improve these outcomes. This study aimed to demonstrate the outcomes of implementing comprehensive care by a MDCT in severe AKI survivors. Methods This study was a randomized controlled trial conducted between August 2018 to January 2021. Patients who survived sev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, after patients at risk of MAKE have been identified, there is still no robust data about the benefits of a specific nephrology follow-up compared to standard care. The first randomized controlled trial investigating this was published in 2021 (19). Patients who survived severe AKI stage 2 or 3 were enrolled and randomized to receive either comprehensive or standard care for 12 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after patients at risk of MAKE have been identified, there is still no robust data about the benefits of a specific nephrology follow-up compared to standard care. The first randomized controlled trial investigating this was published in 2021 (19). Patients who survived severe AKI stage 2 or 3 were enrolled and randomized to receive either comprehensive or standard care for 12 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 35 , 36 Briefly, these data demonstrate improved surrogate outcomes and in some cases, major clinical and cost outcomes. Examples include identifying and resolving medication therapy problems, deprescribing unnecessary or harmful medications, 37 improving blood pressure and albuminuria postacute kidney injury, 38 reducing risk categorization for patients with kidney transplant, 39 reducing hospital lengths of stay 35 and hospital readmissions among patients on dialysis, 36 and reducing medication errors, adverse events, and hospitalizations among transplant recipients 40 with associated cost savings. 41 Recent publications in primary care also demonstrated reduced physician burnout when pharmacists joined the care team as well as high levels of patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from a structured individualised follow-up care plan, there is a need for more research and intervention studies in post-AKI care. In particular, the role of biomarkers to predict patients at high-risk of developing worse kidney outcomes, the role of protective drugs like renin–angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors or statins in prevention of CKD after AKI, and the effectiveness of post-AKI clinic should be explored [ 41 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%