2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis of the temporomandibular joint in different vertical skeletal facial patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all publications, with one exception [22], both women and men were studied. Only 4 papers were linear measurements performed by more than 1 researcher [34,35,56,57]. The position of the condyle and spatial analysis was evaluated most often in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In all publications, with one exception [22], both women and men were studied. Only 4 papers were linear measurements performed by more than 1 researcher [34,35,56,57]. The position of the condyle and spatial analysis was evaluated most often in the sagittal plane.…”
Section: Results Of Individual Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the possible spatial combinations of condyle positioning in the joint had been observed in hypodivergent patients. Both narrowing of the anterior [56], anterior and superior combined, [22,34], and posterior [49], as well as widening of the upper articular talar space, had been demonstrated [24,54].…”
Section: Joint Space and Condylar Position In The Tmj Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For their part, however, Imanimoghaddam et al 34 argued that TMD, especially in the early stages, does not lead to significant dimensional changes in the condyle. Other CBCT studies, which assessed patients with different malocclusion, reported a relationship between TMJ morphological dimensions and TMDs in class II hypodivergent patients 35,36 . Such differences in the findings may be attributed to the variability in the occlusal characteristics of the examined samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Other CBCT studies, which assessed patients with different malocclusion, reported a relationship between TMJ morphological dimensions and TMDs in class II hypodivergent patients. 35,36 Such differences in the findings may be attributed to the variability in the occlusal characteristics of the examined samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%