Comprehensive supervised heavy training program versus home training regimen in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized trial

Abstract

Background There is no consensus on the best training regimen for subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Several have been suggested, but never tested. The purpose of the study is to compare a comprehensive supervised training regimen (STR) based on latest evidence including heavy slow resistance training with a validated home-based regimen (HTR). We hypothesized that the STR would be superior to the HTR. Methods Randomised control trial with blinded assessor. 126 consecutive patients with SIS were recruited and equally randomised to 12 weeks of either supervised training regimen (STR), or home-based training regimen (HTR). Primary outcomes were Constant Score (CS) and Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) from baseline and 6 months after completed training. Results were analyzed according to intention-to treat principles. The study was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Date of registration: 07/06/2021. Identification number: NCT04915430. Results CS improved by 22.7 points for the STR group and by 23,7 points for the HTR (p = 0.0001). The SRQ improved by 17.7 and 18.1 points for the STR and the HTR groups respectively (p = 0.0001). The inter-group changes were non-significant. All secondary outcomes (passive and active range of motion, pain on impingement test, and resisted muscle tests) improved in both groups, without significant inter-group difference. Conclusion We found no significant difference between a comprehensive supervised training regimen including heavy training principles, and a home-based training program in patients with SIS.

Effectiveness of exercise rehabilitation from the hospital to the community in individuals with shoulder disorders: a study protocol

“…In a previous systematic review of exercise in subjects with shoulder pain, a signi cant effect on pain reduction after exercise was observed [17,18]. In addition, in another randomized trial comparing the effects of a supervised program and home exercising in subjects with shoulder disorders, ROM and pain scores were signi cantly improved in both groups [19]. Through these results, the author secured the basis for self-exercise in subjects with shoulder pain; therefore, we decided to provide the same exercise videos to the control and intervention groups.…”

Is exercise therapy the right treatment for rotator cuff‐related shoulder pain? Uncertainties, theory, and practice

“…Those with lower baseline catastrophising benefited more from an extra dose of resistance exercise, whereas those with higher catastrophising scores actually tended towards an unfavourable outcome. Another recent RCT, not included in the Malliaras et al (2020) review, similarly reported no significant difference between a progressive higher load resistance exercise regimen and a lower load programme (Schydlowsky et al, 2022). For tendinopathy in general (including studies pertaining to RCRSP), it has been reported that resistance exercise with an external load, compared to body weight only, is more effective (Pavlova et al, 2023), perhaps increasing credence that some external load is better than none.…”

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Retrospective Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical and Conservative Treatment

“…Спустя 4 недели с начала лечения было обнаружено значительное снижение болевого синдрома у пациентов всех групп, однако заметно лучший психологический эффект был отмечен в группе с использованием интерферентных токов. Schydlowsky et al (2022) [20] провели сравнительный анализ результатов консервативного лечения пациентов с САИС, разделенных на 2 группы 12-недельного лечения. 1-я группа домашней реабилитации состояла из пациентов, обученных упражнениям и выполнявших их самостоятельно дома, 2-я группа -пациенты, прошедшие курс консервативного лечения под присмотром физического терапевта.…”