2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.06890
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive study of the light charged Higgs boson in the type-I two-Higgs-doublet model

Kingman Cheung,
Adil Jueid,
Jinheung Kim
et al.

Abstract: In the type-I two-Higgs-doublet model, existing theoretical and experimental constraints still permit the light charged Higgs boson with a mass below the top quark mass. We present a complete roadmap for the light charged Higgs boson at the LHC through the comprehensive phenomenology study. In type-I, it is challenging to simultaneously accommodate the light mass of the charged Higgs boson and the constraints from theory, electroweak precision data, Higgs data, b → sγ, and direct search bounds. Consequently, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, H, A and H ± are allowed to have broad mass ranges. There are some recent studies on the status of type-I and type-II 2HDMs confronted with the direct searches at the LHC, see, e.g., [106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116]. Flipping the sign of λ 5 , A will be the DM candidate.…”
Section: Searches For Additional Scalars At Lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, H, A and H ± are allowed to have broad mass ranges. There are some recent studies on the status of type-I and type-II 2HDMs confronted with the direct searches at the LHC, see, e.g., [106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116]. Flipping the sign of λ 5 , A will be the DM candidate.…”
Section: Searches For Additional Scalars At Lhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cos(β − α) ≈ 1 with m H 0 = 125 GeV. Studies of the case where H ± → h 0 W * and/or H ± → A 0 W * have a sizeable (or even dominant) BR can be found in [19,20,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. We assume that these decays are negligible/absent, and this is achieved by i) taking m A 0 > m H ± in both the normal and inverted scenarios and ii) in the inverted scenario by having a small mass splitting m H ± −m h 0 which would suppress H ± → h 0 W * .…”
Section: The Branching Ratios Of H ±mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a CP-conserving 2HDM with Type-I Yukawa couplings in the exact Higgs alignment limit, the Yukawa coupling of h 1 coincides with that of the SM, whereas the Yukawa couplings of all other scalar states (both neutral and charged) are proportional to a common factor of 1/ tan β. That is, the couplings of the charged Higgs boson to fermions are suppressed at large tan β > ∼ 10, in which case a charged Higgs mass of the order of 100 GeV [71][72][73] is still allowed. Indeed, other constraints on the parameter space, such as those derived from pp → A → Zh i searches are also weakened if tan β is large.…”
Section: Allowed Mass Range For Non-sm Higgs States Of the 2hdmmentioning
confidence: 99%