2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icuas.2018.8453483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Risk-based Planning for Small Unmanned Aircraft System Rooftop Landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These treatment options could be performed manually after a risk assessment is performed or could be accomplished by high-level automated planning algorithms. Intricate path-planning and decision-making methods could be used to plan optimal flight paths that take into account the acceptable risk of a given sUAS as has been previously demonstrated (Guglieri et al 2015;Castagno et al 2018;Primatesta et al 2019Primatesta et al , 2020. The details of how to adjust the proposed flight plan are highly dependent on the specific operation and therefore are not included in sWRM.…”
Section: E Treat Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These treatment options could be performed manually after a risk assessment is performed or could be accomplished by high-level automated planning algorithms. Intricate path-planning and decision-making methods could be used to plan optimal flight paths that take into account the acceptable risk of a given sUAS as has been previously demonstrated (Guglieri et al 2015;Castagno et al 2018;Primatesta et al 2019Primatesta et al , 2020. The details of how to adjust the proposed flight plan are highly dependent on the specific operation and therefore are not included in sWRM.…”
Section: E Treat Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dashed lines indicate results where holes are included in the ground truth polygon. Each test was run 10 times with input point set sizes ranging from (2,4,8,16,32,64) thousand points with mean timing and error plotted. Confidence intervals are provided for execution timing, however they are almost imperceptible because the variance is low at this scale.…”
Section: A State Shapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) also need simplified representations of operating regions for navigation and landing [6], [7], particularly in complex urban regions. Surfaces such as flat rooftops can offer safe nearby landing zones once planarity/shape is determined [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic characterization of building roof architecture and slope offers a new dimension to traditional terrain data. These data could be used to rapidly identify building change or damage from the air, to improve in-flight localization capabilities in GPS-denied areas, and to inform small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) of alternative ditching sites, a problem previously investigated by the authors [ 1 , 2 ]. Databases such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) [ 3 ] provide limited roof information, but such data have been manually entered to-date thus is sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that combining datasets from both small and large cities leads to a more generalized model and improves performance. Figure 1 provides an overview of the data processing pipeline and illustrates a UAS localization and contingency landing use case [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%