2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14133101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Urban Waterlogging Disaster Based on MCDA-GIS Integration: The Case Study of Changchun, China

Abstract: Urban waterlogging will harm economic development and people’s life safety; however, the waterlogging risk zoning map provides the necessary decision support for the management of urban waterlogging, urban development and urban planning. This paper proposes an urban waterlogging risk assessment method that combines multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) with a geographic information system (GIS). The framework of urban waterlogging risk assessment includes four main elements: hazard, exposure, vulnerability, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, based on the complexity and diversity of urban transportation systems, 22 indicators were selected to evaluate their resilience, taking into account hazards, vulnerabilities, exposure, and emergency response and recovery capabilities (Duan, et al 2022). Specifically, hazard considers the impact of natural disasters on the transportation system, vulnerability considers the connectivity of the transportation network and the distribution of economic activities, exposure considers the distribution of the urban population and the criticality of the nodes, and disaster prevention and mitigation capacity consider the emergency response and post-disaster recovery capacity of the transportation system.…”
Section: Indicator System and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, based on the complexity and diversity of urban transportation systems, 22 indicators were selected to evaluate their resilience, taking into account hazards, vulnerabilities, exposure, and emergency response and recovery capabilities (Duan, et al 2022). Specifically, hazard considers the impact of natural disasters on the transportation system, vulnerability considers the connectivity of the transportation network and the distribution of economic activities, exposure considers the distribution of the urban population and the criticality of the nodes, and disaster prevention and mitigation capacity consider the emergency response and post-disaster recovery capacity of the transportation system.…”
Section: Indicator System and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong winds may trigger the fall of trees and the collapse of buildings, causing damage to the urban environment and further affecting the operation of the transportation system. In addition, when the wind speed is high, a large amount of flying dust and flying sand may be generated, reducing the visibility of the road and increasing the risk of traffic accidents (Zhang et al 2022). The spatial distribution of hazard indicators is shown in Fig 3.…”
Section: Urban Transportation System Hazard Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study developed by Duan et al [8], aimed at assessing the waterlogging risk, the authors combined multi-criteria decision analysis and geographic information systems Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4288 2 of 37 to determine, among other components, such as hazard, vulnerability, and emergency response and recovery capability, the exposure level to that risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index system method is a useful tool for assessing flood risk, with some researchers proposing indices such as disaster-causing factors, disaster-pregnant environments, disaster-bearing bodies, and disaster prevention and reduction capacity. By calculating the weight of each index, it is possible to obtain a quantitative expression of flood disaster risk [41,42]. However, the selection and weighting of indices are crucial for ensuring the validity of the assessment process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%