2020
DOI: 10.1080/15422119.2020.1831537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Review of Transcriptomics (RNAs) Workflows from Blood Specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive photoresist AZ5214E (Merck, Kenil-worth, NJ) was spun on the wafer for 35 s at 4000 rpm to have 1 μm thickness. (5) The wafer was then soft-baked at 110 • C for 50 s before ultraviolet (UV) exposure. (6) The wafer was exposed to UV light with 20 W/m 2 intensity for 7 s to transfer the IDT patterns from the mask.…”
Section: Device Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive photoresist AZ5214E (Merck, Kenil-worth, NJ) was spun on the wafer for 35 s at 4000 rpm to have 1 μm thickness. (5) The wafer was then soft-baked at 110 • C for 50 s before ultraviolet (UV) exposure. (6) The wafer was exposed to UV light with 20 W/m 2 intensity for 7 s to transfer the IDT patterns from the mask.…”
Section: Device Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma samples are obtained by centrifugation of WB samples with anticoagulants, while serum samples are obtained by centrifugation of WB samples without anticoagulants or with procoagulants (Sotelo-Orozco et al 2021). WB, plasma, and serum samples are commonly used for transcriptomic studies due to their sample availability and convenience of collection under ideal conditions (Qin et al 2016;Mjelle et al 2019;Husseini et al 2022). However, the remaining sediment samples after plasma or serum separation are often discarded or stored for biological resource preservation in real-world scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these concerns, our study aimed to assess the viability of employing either PFB or SFB samples as substitute RNA sources in transcriptomic analysis. Previous research have demonstrated the influence of pre-analytical factors on RNA quality and gene expression (Debey-Pascher et al 2011;Mastrokolias et al 2012;Dvinge et al 2014;Shin et al 2014;Zhao et al 2014;Huang et al 2017;Reust et al 2018;Shen et al 2018;Donohue et al 2019;Gautam et al 2019;He et al 2019b;Harrington et al 2020;Xing et al 2021;Chebbo et al 2022;Husseini et al 2022). However, a comprehensive understanding of the similarities and differences among WB, PFB, and SFB samples in transcriptomic research remains elusive, making it crucial to evaluate their suitability for various applications using reliable metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good quality of high-throughput technology-based findings, such as those produced by “omics” approaches, is dependent on high quality samples (Alsagaby 2019b ; Horgan et al 2011 ; Lowe et al 2017 ). Preserved integrity of RNA sample is greatly needed to truly reflect the status of in vivo transcriptome (Husseini et al 2021 ). RNA degradation is a physiological process that is tightly regulated to determine the fate of RNA (Houseley et al 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%