Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of inflammatory age-clock-related genes as prognostic and immunity markers based on multi-omics data

Abstract

Inflammatory age (iAge) is a vital concept for understanding the intricate interplay between chronic inflammation and aging in the context of cancer. However, the importance of iAge-clock-related genes (iAge-CRGs) across cancers remains unexplored. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms and applications of these genes across diverse cancer types. We analyzed profiling data from over 10,000 individuals, covering 33 cancer types, 750 small molecule drugs, and 24 immune cell types. We focused on DCBLD2’s function at the single-cell level and computed an iAge-CRG score using GSVA. This score was correlated with cancer pathways, immune infiltration, and survival. A signature was then derived using univariate Cox and LASSO regression, followed by ROC curve analysis, nomogram construction, decision curve analysis, and immunocytochemistry. Our comprehensive analysis revealed epigenetic, genomic, and immunogenomic alterations in iAge-CRGs, especially DCBLD2, leading to abnormal expression. Aberrant DCBLD2 expression strongly correlated with cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration and prognosis in multiple cancers. Based on GSVA results, we developed a risk model using five iAge-CRGs, which proved to be an independent prognostic index for uveal melanoma (UVM) patients. We also systematically evaluated the correlation between the iAge-related signature risk score and immune cell infiltration. iAge-CRGs, particularly DCBLD2, emerge as potential targets for enhancing immunotherapy outcomes. The strong correlation between abnormal DCBLD2 expression, cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration, and patient survival across various cancers underscores their significance. Our five-gene risk signature offers an independent prognostic tool for UVM patients, highlighting the crucial role of these genes in suppressing the immune response in UVM.Kindly check and confirm whether the corresponding affiliation is correctly identified.I identified the affiliation is correctly.thank you.Per style, a structured abstract is not allowed so we have changed the structured abstract to an unstructured abstract. Please check and confirm.I confirm the abstract is correctly ,thank you.