1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(96)00401-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive model of oxidative coupling of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high conversion in the bubble formation zone that is characterized by intensive interphase gas exchange and plug-flow of gas reduces the influence of gas backmixing in the emulsion phase and the mass transport limitation between the bubbles and the emulsion phase. For the same reasons the effect of homogeneous gas phase reactions that take place mainly in the bubbles can mostly be neglected for laboratory-scale fluidized beds (Do et al, 1995;Pannek and Mleczko, 1996). The results obtained in this study qualitatively agree with the results of Do et al (1995), who measured lower C2+ selectivities and yields in a spouted bed and in a spouted bed with a draft tube than in the fluidized bed.…”
Section: Factors Influencing C2 Selectivity and Yield In Various Reacsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high conversion in the bubble formation zone that is characterized by intensive interphase gas exchange and plug-flow of gas reduces the influence of gas backmixing in the emulsion phase and the mass transport limitation between the bubbles and the emulsion phase. For the same reasons the effect of homogeneous gas phase reactions that take place mainly in the bubbles can mostly be neglected for laboratory-scale fluidized beds (Do et al, 1995;Pannek and Mleczko, 1996). The results obtained in this study qualitatively agree with the results of Do et al (1995), who measured lower C2+ selectivities and yields in a spouted bed and in a spouted bed with a draft tube than in the fluidized bed.…”
Section: Factors Influencing C2 Selectivity and Yield In Various Reacsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…E-mail address: L.Mleczko@risc.techem.ruhr-uni-bochurn.de of methane in fluidized-bed reactors, Cz+ selectivity was influenced by mass transport limitation between bubbles and the emulsion as well as by the backmixing of gas in the emulsion. At high temperatures and partial pressures of oxygen, the mass transport restrictions and backmixing of gas suppressed high selectivity and yield to higher hydrocarbons (Pannek and Mleczko. 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 cm (Yates, 1983) it can be expected that oxygen conversion is only influenced to a small extent by the mass transport between bubbles and the emulsion phase. This conclusion is supported by simulation results (Mleczko et al, 1992;Pannek and Mleczko, 1996) in which small differences between the oxygen concentration in bubbles and in the emulsion phase were predicted for a laboratory-scale reactor.…”
Section: Pathway Of Ocm In a Fluidized-bedsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…reported C 2 yields of 15.5% together with 31% methane conversion and 51% C 2 selectivity, which were too far from commercial application limits . Pannek and Mleczko modeled and simulated OCM in a fluidized‐bed reactor, and observed C 2 yields up to 17% which is slightly higher than those obtained in packed‐beds. The same authors also concluded that, in an industrial fluidized‐bed reactor, C 2 yields will be lower when compared with a lab‐scale reactor, due to larger contact times .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control of temperature, residence time and its distribution depends strongly on the structure and geometry of the catalytic reactor. Even though many studies have been carried out for formulating catalysts to achieve high methane conversion together with improved product selectivity and ethylene yield, the number of studies addressing the effect of reactor type and structure is scarce . The very first reactors used to test OCM were packed‐bed type, which led to the formation of axial and radial temperature gradients in the reactor due to the high exothermicity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%