2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive investigation of methane conversion over Ni(111) surface under a consistent DFT framework: Implications for anti-coking of SOFC anodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…84 In general, the estimated pre-exponential factors (eq S50) were identical to those reported by Dumesic et al 85 and estimated with the methodology proposed by Campbell et al 86 , Table 3. Similarly, the activation energies, as well as the standard reaction and adsorption enthalpies in this model, matched those reported in microkinetic modelling studies, 41,74,80 molecular simulations over Ni surfaces, 36,73,76,77,87,88 and experimental data. 11,71 For example, the activation energy for the oxygen-assisted C-H bond cleavage (step 1, Table 2) was in close agreement with the experimental value of 95kJ.mol -1 for Ni-Co catalyst 11 and microkinetic studies of 88−93kJ.mol -1 for Ni-based catalysts.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Solution Of The Kinetic Modelssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…84 In general, the estimated pre-exponential factors (eq S50) were identical to those reported by Dumesic et al 85 and estimated with the methodology proposed by Campbell et al 86 , Table 3. Similarly, the activation energies, as well as the standard reaction and adsorption enthalpies in this model, matched those reported in microkinetic modelling studies, 41,74,80 molecular simulations over Ni surfaces, 36,73,76,77,87,88 and experimental data. 11,71 For example, the activation energy for the oxygen-assisted C-H bond cleavage (step 1, Table 2) was in close agreement with the experimental value of 95kJ.mol -1 for Ni-Co catalyst 11 and microkinetic studies of 88−93kJ.mol -1 for Ni-based catalysts.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Solution Of The Kinetic Modelssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…87 The values of the activation energy and reaction enthalpy for the sequential H-abstraction reactions (step 2-4) were in the range of 65-130kJ.mol -1 , 36,41,73,74,80 and even their trend, i.e., a decrease in the activation energy upon the first H-abstraction and increase again for the last H-scission was similar to those predicted with molecular simulations. 36,73,76,88 Moreover, the steps involved in H2O production (steps 7 and 8) displayed activation energies of 89 ± 3 and 48 ± 3kJ.mol -1 , respectively, which were close to the values of 104 and 41kJ.mol -1 reported in microkinetic models. 74,80 Also, the corresponding standard enthalpies of 28 ± 1…”
Section: Analysis Of the Solution Of The Kinetic Modelssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, using a combination of ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (AP-XPS) and molecular modeling based on density functional theory (DFT), we present a comprehensive study of the MSR reaction on the surface of model Ni/CeO2(111) catalysts and compare with results reported for the extended Ni(111) surface in the literature. [21][22][23][24][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] We show that low-loaded Ni/CeO2 catalysts have sites with unique properties that result from the nature of both the metallic phase and the support as well as their interactions, which enable the facile activation of C−H and O−H bonds from CH4 and H2O, respectively. The calculated elementary dehydrogenation and oxidation steps along the MSR reaction reveal that the crucial step is the formation of a COH intermediate via the reaction of carbon atoms with OH groups, suppressing carbon deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…19 However, experimental and computational studies have shown that the reactions of carbonaceous species with oxygen to form the C-O bond also involve high energy barriers, and could therefore be rate-controlling. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Furthermore, in previous combined computational and in-situ spectroscopic studies, it was shown that well-dispersed small Ni nanoparticles supported on a non-reduced CeO2 surface can in fact activate CH4 at room temperature, with calculated energy barriers up to 80% lower than those for extended nickel surfaces. [27][28][29][30][31] This highlights the need to consider both the effect of the nature of the support and the metal loading to fully understand the mechanism governing the MSR reaction over supported metal catalysts, which is necessary for the development of improved catalytic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%