2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.75555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive interrogation of the ADAR2 deaminase domain for engineering enhanced RNA editing activity and specificity

Abstract: Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) can be repurposed to enable programmable RNA editing, however their enzymatic activity on adenosines flanked by a 5' guanosine is very low, thus limiting their utility as a transcriptome engineering toolset. To address this issue, we first performed a novel deep mutational scan of the ADAR2 deaminase domain, directly measuring the impact of every amino acid substitution across 261 residues, on RNA editing. This enabled us to create a domain wide mutagenesis map while … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that ADARs have 5′, 3′, and opposite base preferences within base paired, A-form duplexes. , Indeed, these preferences are well understood, and they can be used to inform the design of ADAR guide strands for site-directed RNA editing applications. ,,,,, However, these preferences are not absolute as ADARs can deaminate adenosines in natural substrate RNAs that contain suboptimal nearest neighbors and/or are adjacent to helix defects, etc . ,, Furthermore, many therapeutically relevant target adenosines for directed RNA editing applications do not conform to ADAR’s known preferred nearest neighbors. , In such cases where rational design based on current knowledge of ADAR-RNA recognition is insufficient, it is sensible to screen for sequences that can enable editing by forming beneficial, non-Watson–Crick structural features in the RNA. Different screening strategies for ADAR-RNA combinations have been published, but each requires transfection of plasmid libraries, limiting the size of libraries that can be practically screened. ,, Here we describe a type of screen that does not require plasmid transfections, and that allows one to query very large libraries. By linking an editing site covalently through a hairpin loop to a site where the sequence is randomized, we could use NGS to quantify the number of reads of G or A associated with each specific sequence within the randomized region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that ADARs have 5′, 3′, and opposite base preferences within base paired, A-form duplexes. , Indeed, these preferences are well understood, and they can be used to inform the design of ADAR guide strands for site-directed RNA editing applications. ,,,,, However, these preferences are not absolute as ADARs can deaminate adenosines in natural substrate RNAs that contain suboptimal nearest neighbors and/or are adjacent to helix defects, etc . ,, Furthermore, many therapeutically relevant target adenosines for directed RNA editing applications do not conform to ADAR’s known preferred nearest neighbors. , In such cases where rational design based on current knowledge of ADAR-RNA recognition is insufficient, it is sensible to screen for sequences that can enable editing by forming beneficial, non-Watson–Crick structural features in the RNA. Different screening strategies for ADAR-RNA combinations have been published, but each requires transfection of plasmid libraries, limiting the size of libraries that can be practically screened. ,, Here we describe a type of screen that does not require plasmid transfections, and that allows one to query very large libraries. By linking an editing site covalently through a hairpin loop to a site where the sequence is randomized, we could use NGS to quantify the number of reads of G or A associated with each specific sequence within the randomized region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different screening strategies for ADAR-RNA combinations have been published, but each requires transfection of plasmid libraries, limiting the size of libraries that can be practically screened. 14,20,23 Here we describe a type of screen that does not require plasmid transfections, and that allows one to query very large libraries. By linking an editing site covalently through a hairpin loop to a site where the sequence is randomized, we could use NGS to quantify the number of reads of G or A associated with each specific sequence within the randomized region.…”
Section: Development Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common problem with delivering the naked DD with a gRNA is that it tends to create many off-target edits, not only within the targeted message but also in unrelated messages across the transcriptome (Vallecillo-Viejo et al 2018;Buchumenski et al 2021). Approaches such as localizing the DD to the nucleus, or splitting it into two units that only form a functional deaminase enzyme when they come together, have significantly reduced unwanted edits (Vallecillo-Viejo et al 2018;Katrekar et al 2022a). These engineered systems have been used to good effect in vivo.…”
Section: Site-directed Rna Editing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current directed RNA editing methods either employ endogenous human ADARs or overexpress engineered ADAR proteins with improved efficiency and target specificity. 22,23 To achieve better editing outcomes for therapeutic RNA editing using endogenous ADARs, chemically modified guide oligonucleotides (∼30−40 nt long) are presently utilized. 3,22 An example of a chemically modified guide that has been previously used by our lab is shown in Figure 2B, 3 and a detailed discussion of the chemical modifications that specifically enhance ADAR catalysis is presented in section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADAR performs the corrective A-to-I edit, resulting in a transcript that would now translate to a functional protein (Figure A). Current directed RNA editing methods either employ endogenous human ADARs or overexpress engineered ADAR proteins with improved efficiency and target specificity. , To achieve better editing outcomes for therapeutic RNA editing using endogenous ADARs, chemically modified guide oligonucleotides (∼30–40 nt long) are presently utilized. , An example of a chemically modified guide that has been previously used by our lab is shown in Figure B, and a detailed discussion of the chemical modifications that specifically enhance ADAR catalysis is presented in section . However, other backbone (phosphorothioate (PS) and phosphoryl DMI amidate (PN) linkages) and sugar (2′-deoxy, 2′- O -methyl (2′-OMe), 2′-fluoro (2′-F), and locked nucleic acid (LNA)) modifications are also being employed to improve the metabolic stability, target binding kinetics, and specificity of guide oligonucleotides (Figure B). ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%