“…Generally, rare or toxic inorganic compounds (tellurium, selenium, lead, etc.) with excellent thermoelectric performance have been used to investigate thermoelectric materials. − However, inorganic materials have common characteristics that limit their utilization, such as scarce resources, rigid form factors for compatibility with uneven surfaces, and expensive fabrication processes. , Flexible thermoelectric devices based on inorganic materials were reported; however, the flexibility needs to be applied from support by either the flexible substrate or blending with the flexible component. − Conversely, organic thermoelectric materials can overcome the aforementioned limitations because of their unique advantages over inorganic thermoelectric materials, such as intrinsic mechanical flexibility, scalable/low-cost manufacturing, and lightweight. − Organic/polymeric thermoelectric devices can be a promising candidate for future wearable/flexible thermoelectric energy conversion technologies that can be used for low-grade waste heat harvesting because more than 60% of unutilized waste heat is generated at a temperature below 150 °C owing to energy conversion inefficiencies. − Molecular doping of conjugated polymers, such as polyanilines, polythiophenes, metallated polymers, and donor–acceptor polymers, is widely used to study the thermoelectric properties. − Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), one of the most popular and high-performance thermoelectric polythiophene derivatives, and poly(styrene sulfonic acid) (PSS), a counterion, have been commercially used for thermoelectric materials through various doping/dedoping processes. − …”