2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01023-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive genomic profiling of EWSR1/FUS::CREB translocation-associated tumors uncovers prognostically significant recurrent genetic alterations and methylation-transcriptional correlates

Abstract: To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the divergent clinicopathologic spectrum of EWSR1/FUS - CREB translocation-associated tumors, we performed a comprehensive genomic analysis of fusion transcript variants, recurrent genetic alterations (mutations, copy number alterations), gene expression, and methylation profiles across a large cohort of tumor types. The distribution of the EWSR1 / FUS fusion partners – … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,23,24 The structural variants found in the 3 IN-TSCTs that underwent DNA sequencing consisted of in-frame gene fusions that contained exons 1 to 7 or 1 to 6 of EWSR1 and exons 4 to 7 of ATF1. 50 These fusion genes are expected to result in protein products with the characteristics described above. Hypothetically, high-level amplification of ATF1 could have oncogenic effects similar to those of constitutively activated fusion proteins that contain its DNA-binding domain.…”
Section: Fish Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,23,24 The structural variants found in the 3 IN-TSCTs that underwent DNA sequencing consisted of in-frame gene fusions that contained exons 1 to 7 or 1 to 6 of EWSR1 and exons 4 to 7 of ATF1. 50 These fusion genes are expected to result in protein products with the characteristics described above. Hypothetically, high-level amplification of ATF1 could have oncogenic effects similar to those of constitutively activated fusion proteins that contain its DNA-binding domain.…”
Section: Fish Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the immunophenotypic findings are indistinguishable, cytogenetic or molecular diagnostic assays can easily separate CCS from melanoma. While CCS harbors EWSR1 rearrangements, most often EWSR1::ATF1 ,7,8 rarely EWSR1::CREB1 or EWSR1::CREM ,13 melanomas lack such translocations 17. In contrast, most melanomas harbor mitogen-activated protein kinase alterations, such as activating mutations in the BRAF or NRAS genes, or inactivating mutations in NF1 17…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…negative CCS harbor either EWSR1::CREB1 or EWSR1:: CREM fusions, 13,14 believed to introduce similar transcriptomic changes. Unlike melanomas, CCS exhibits quiet genomes with a low mutational burden and an absence of mitogenactivated protein kinase pathway alterations, 13,15,16 such as BRAF V600E (common in melanomas 17 and amenable to targeted therapy 18 ). These differences in management make it crucial for surgical pathologists to distinguish CCS from melanoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EWSR1 is ubiquitously expressed and belongs to the FET family of RNA binding proteins and, due to its strong transactivator domain, drives the oncogenic potential of its various transcription factor partners. The so‐called “EWSR1‐family of tumors” encompasses a growing spectrum of tumors, including both benign and highly malignant mesenchymal neoplasms, as well as a small subset of carcinomas, myoepithelial carcinomas, and mesotheliomas 36 . Thus, modeling specific EWSR1 ‐related gene fusions needs to consider the cell lineage and differentiation of the specific tumor being driven.…”
Section: Investigating the Appropriate Cellular Contexts In Modeling ...mentioning
confidence: 99%