“…Similarly, in a US study, involving three IRD pedigrees, each given an initial diagnosis of RP, one with a dominant RP and the other two with a dominant, incompletely penetrant RP, it was found that multiple IRD genes were responsible for various affected individuals in each of the three families: both USH2A and RP1 was segregating in one family; PRPH2 and CRX in a second family and PRPH2 , PRPH8 and USH2A in the third family [ 85 ]. These studies, however, are trumped in complexity by Birtel et al’s analysis of a single family with four different IRDs each caused by distinct pathogenic variants and inheritance patterns: father, RHO , dominant RP; mother, ABCA4 and CACNA1F , recessive Stargardt and CSNB; first son, CACNA1F , CSNB; second son, MITF , dominant Waardenburg syndrome [ 86 ]. These are some examples of the many that exist, illustrating the complexity of IRD screening and reinforcing the necessity of thorough clinical and genetic investigation prior to genetic counselling [ 87 ].…”