2017
DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2017.1389085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive evaluation of low-temperature fracture indices for asphalt mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, fracture energy (G f ), as one of the main fracture parameters, can be calculated from the area under the load-CMOD curve. However, it has been found by many researchers (Al-Qadi et al [32], Zhu et al [33], and Pérez-Jiménez et al [34]) that the fracture energy has its drawbacks and could not fully distinguish between the cracking behavior of the mixtures. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the mixture with high peak load (about 3.8 kN) and steep post-peak slope has very close fracture energy value with the mixture exhibiting low peak load (about 2.5 kN) and shallow post-peak slope.…”
Section: Low-temperature Fracture Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, fracture energy (G f ), as one of the main fracture parameters, can be calculated from the area under the load-CMOD curve. However, it has been found by many researchers (Al-Qadi et al [32], Zhu et al [33], and Pérez-Jiménez et al [34]) that the fracture energy has its drawbacks and could not fully distinguish between the cracking behavior of the mixtures. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the mixture with high peak load (about 3.8 kN) and steep post-peak slope has very close fracture energy value with the mixture exhibiting low peak load (about 2.5 kN) and shallow post-peak slope.…”
Section: Low-temperature Fracture Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32], Zhu et al [33], and Pérez-Jiménez et al [34]) that the fracture energy has its drawbacks and could not fully distinguish between the cracking behavior of the mixtures. It can be seen in Figure 4 that the mixture with high peak load (about 3.8 kN) and steep post-peak slope has very close fracture energy value with the mixture exhibiting low peak load (about 2.5 kN) and shallow post-peak slope.…”
Section: Low-temperature Fracture Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be achieved by various means: by selecting a certain type of the binder and its amount, type and gradation size of the aggregate mixture and also by incorporating different additives into the binder or asphalt mixture as a whole, e.g. polymers, recycled rubber, fibres or natural bitumen [3, 10,11,15,17,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining asphalt mixture that would possess higher resistance to cracking depends not only on the mix design process alone but must also incorporate proper test method [27], allowing to differentiate asphalt mixtures in terms of cracking characteristics. For many years' efforts were mainly put into development of test methods concerning resistance to permanent deformation (Wheel Tracking Test, Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test, Asphalt Pavement Analyzer), fatigue life (4-point bending test, 2-point bending test) or low-temperature properties (TSRST, ATCA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%