“… 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 Of the at least 20 parameters studied, only RA area, the ratio of TAPSE with pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP), and pericardial effusion are cited in guidelines. 5 , 34 , 35 Additionally, significant gaps exist in the literature due to nonstandardized imaging variables and algorithms and a lack of large multicenter studies or systematic data collection across studies, 36 rendering evidence related to the use of RH imaging relatively weak and limited. There is little consensus on which RH imaging variables are appropriate, how objective imaging should be incorporated into the standard of care, whether imaging provides value beyond standard assessments of risk, and how imaging should be used in treatment decision‐making.…”