Comprehensive characterization of AA 2024T3 fiber metal laminate with nanosilica‐reinforced epoxy based polymeric composite panel for lightweight applications
Abstract:Fiber metal laminates (FMLs) are a hybrid composite material used in aircraft structural parts. They are fabricated by stacking thin aluminum sheets with a fiber-reinforced polymer composite. In this research work, nanosilica was mixed with epoxy resin in different weight percentages such as 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 wt% for the preparation of FML. Nanosilica was used as a secondary reinforcement in the epoxy resin to improve the interfacial bonding and mechanical strength of the FML. The morphology and chemical compo… Show more
“…FMLs were fabricated using aluminum sheets having two different kinds of surface pre‐treatments (mechanical and chemical). Mechanical pre‐treatment of aluminum surfaces was carried out by subjecting them to mechanical abrasion using various grades of silicon carbide grit papers (P80 and P180) to remove the loosely adherent oxides and introduce roughness on the aluminum surface 31,32 . The residual metal debris on the abraded aluminum surfaces was cleaned with acetone to remove unwanted contaminants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical pre-treatment of aluminum surfaces was carried out by subjecting them to mechanical abrasion using various grades of silicon carbide grit papers (P80 and P180) to remove the loosely adherent oxides and introduce roughness on the aluminum surface. 31,32 The residual metal debris on the abraded aluminum surfaces was cleaned with acetone to remove unwanted contaminants. For chemical pre-treatment, the aluminum sheets were immersed in 100 g/L sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution at 60 C for 10 min after the mechanical abrasion process.…”
The inferior delamination resistance and out‐of‐plane performance of fiber metal laminates (FMLs) are of serious concerns. This work employs two modification methods, namely metal surface's chemical pre‐treatment and nano Al2O3 embedded interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) formation for improving the delamination resistance of aluminum and glass fiber‐reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite‐based FMLs. The synergetic effect of the two modification techniques resulted in high degrees of improvement in delamination resistance that were ~28% for critical strain energy release rate during mode‐I interlaminar fracture toughness (ILFT), that is (GIC) and ~37% for GIIC. Simultaneously, the flexural strength, tensile strength, and interlaminar shear strength improved by ~23%, ~17%, and ~24%, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and surface energy measurement studies showed that the chemical pre‐treatment significantly influenced the surface morphology, surface roughness, and surface energy responses of aluminum, respectively. Fractographic study validated the effect of modification methods on the failure behavior under various testing modes.
“…FMLs were fabricated using aluminum sheets having two different kinds of surface pre‐treatments (mechanical and chemical). Mechanical pre‐treatment of aluminum surfaces was carried out by subjecting them to mechanical abrasion using various grades of silicon carbide grit papers (P80 and P180) to remove the loosely adherent oxides and introduce roughness on the aluminum surface 31,32 . The residual metal debris on the abraded aluminum surfaces was cleaned with acetone to remove unwanted contaminants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical pre-treatment of aluminum surfaces was carried out by subjecting them to mechanical abrasion using various grades of silicon carbide grit papers (P80 and P180) to remove the loosely adherent oxides and introduce roughness on the aluminum surface. 31,32 The residual metal debris on the abraded aluminum surfaces was cleaned with acetone to remove unwanted contaminants. For chemical pre-treatment, the aluminum sheets were immersed in 100 g/L sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution at 60 C for 10 min after the mechanical abrasion process.…”
The inferior delamination resistance and out‐of‐plane performance of fiber metal laminates (FMLs) are of serious concerns. This work employs two modification methods, namely metal surface's chemical pre‐treatment and nano Al2O3 embedded interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) formation for improving the delamination resistance of aluminum and glass fiber‐reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite‐based FMLs. The synergetic effect of the two modification techniques resulted in high degrees of improvement in delamination resistance that were ~28% for critical strain energy release rate during mode‐I interlaminar fracture toughness (ILFT), that is (GIC) and ~37% for GIIC. Simultaneously, the flexural strength, tensile strength, and interlaminar shear strength improved by ~23%, ~17%, and ~24%, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and surface energy measurement studies showed that the chemical pre‐treatment significantly influenced the surface morphology, surface roughness, and surface energy responses of aluminum, respectively. Fractographic study validated the effect of modification methods on the failure behavior under various testing modes.
“…In most of the literature AA 2024-T3 has been used for the fabrication of FMLs. 7,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Few of the researchers have also used other grades of aluminum alloys such as AA 1050, [40][41][42] AA 1060-H12, 43 AA 1200-H14, 44 AA 2024-O, 45 AA 5005, 46 AA 5052-O, 47 AA 5052-H32, [48][49][50] AA 6061-T6, 17,29,51,52 AA 6063-T6, 53 and AA 7075-T6. 52,54,55 Limited amount of work has been conducted on the Magnesium alloy, 56,57 Titanium, 45 and Steel.…”
Section: Research Gap Addressed In the Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a component level application, Wang et al 31 established a multi‐objective integrated optimization framework considering for the fabrication of a tapered rim composed of CFRP rim and aluminum alloy spoke. In most of the literature AA 2024‐T3 has been used for the fabrication of FMLs 7,32–39 . Few of the researchers have also used other grades of aluminum alloys such as AA 1050, 40–42 AA 1060‐H12, 43 AA 1200‐H14, 44 AA 2024‐O, 45 AA 5005, 46 AA 5052‐O, 47 AA 5052‐H32, 48–50 AA 6061‐T6, 17,29,51,52 AA 6063‐T6, 53 and AA 7075‐T6 52,54,55 .…”
Section: Research Gap Addressed In the Papermentioning
A detailed experimental investigation was carried out for the high‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐fiber metal laminates (FMLs). FMLs with different metal volume fractions and the same thickness of carbon‐epoxy fiber laminates were tested to examine the surface and internal damage. The ballistic performance parameters, namely % escalation in absorbed energy, specific energy absorbed, ballistic limit, specific perforation energy, first cracking energy, and global deformation profile, were studied and a comparison was drawn with pure carbons fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates. Despite having greater thickness, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates absorbed less impact energy than FMLs and failed catastrophically. For FMLs, the % escalation in the absorbed energy and the specific energy absorption kept increasing with the increasing impact velocity until the onset of perforation. Once the perforation started, both these parameters showed a decreasing trend. Thick FMLs absorbed a good amount of energy, leading to projectile recoil suffering minimal damage. The ballistic velocity, specific perforation energy, and first cracking energy on the front and rear face of FMLs layers showed an increasing trend. The minimum for the thinner and maximum for the thicker FMLs attributed to the large thickness and more metal volume fraction. Contrary to the large deformation of the impacting points, pure carbon fiber‐reinforced epoxy composite laminates showed very minimal deformation as compared to FMLs. The brittle nature of the epoxy resin resisted the deformation to a large extent leading to less energy absorption.Highlights
High‐velocity ballistic response of AA 1100‐H14 based carbon‐FMLs was investigated.
Ballistic performance parameters of FMLs were studied and was compared with carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates.
The ballistic limit of FMLs showed a direct dependence its thickness and metal volume fraction.
In the absence of any metallic layer, pure carbons fiber reinforced composite laminates absorbed less impact energy.
“…1 FMLs have been initially applied in the aerospace industry, such as Glare ® and CARALL ® , which were fabricated by glass or carbon fiber reinforced thermoset composites and aluminum layers. [2][3][4][5][6] It has been reported that FMLs not only possess excellent fatigue resistance and high strength of FRP but also maintain the ductility of metal materials with high specific stiffness, low crack propagation, and good dynamic properties. [7][8][9] In general, the traditional and commercial FMLs are based on fiber-reinforced thermosetting resins (i.e.…”
In the current work, fiber‐metal laminates (FMLs) consisting of alternated continuous fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composite layers and aluminum alloy sheets were proposed by the hot‐pressing method. Carbon fiber‐reinforced polyamide 6 (PA6/CF) and glass fiber‐reinforced polypropylene (PP/GF) prepregs were selected as composite layers. The effect of the assembly method between composite prepreg and aluminum sheets as well as the stacking configurations on the flexural response of FMLs were investigated. Meanwhile, the macro and micro‐structural observations were performed to characterize failure mechanisms in these structures. Experimental results revealed that the strength and stiffness of hybrid FLMs depended on the material property on the surface layer. With the stacking sequence of aluminum sandwiched by PA6/CF achieved the highest flexural strength of 535.3 MPa and modulus of 63.6 GPa in the series of FMLs, which could achieve satisfied lightweight and strength‐stiffness properties. The ductile deformation of aluminum sheets and fracturing and pulling out of the fibers were the main characterized failure mechanisms of thermoplastic FMLs. For glass fiber‐metal laminates, stacking configurations of three aluminum sheets alternation with four PP/GF intermediate layers achieved a favorable flexural property. Above all, the proposed thermoplastic FMLs have great potential in civil applications especially in the automobile industry as structural parts.Highlights
Thermoplastic fiber‐metal laminates are designed and fabricated.
The assembly method and stacking sequences influence the flexural property.
FMLs with PA6/CF and aluminum achieve satisfied strength stiffness.
PP/GF prepreg and aluminum layer display ductile deformation mode.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.