2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01610-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive cardiac phenotyping in large animals: comparison of pressure–volume analysis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pig post-myocardial infarction systolic heart failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our mechanical simulation based on measured fiber elasticity and orientation confirmed the accuracy of the model. By simulating the P-V loop, our results showed that the numerical model demonstrated a progressive increase in volume caused by internal pressure, which was compatible with a measured P-V loop (Raake et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our mechanical simulation based on measured fiber elasticity and orientation confirmed the accuracy of the model. By simulating the P-V loop, our results showed that the numerical model demonstrated a progressive increase in volume caused by internal pressure, which was compatible with a measured P-V loop (Raake et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The simulated ventricular pressure was increased from 5.5 mmHg to 11 mmHg, while the ventricular volume was accordingly increased to 112 mL in the CT-based model and 113 mL in the cylindrical model. This pressure-volume change was compared to a known Pressure-Volume loop issued from a healthy pig heart (Raake et al, 2019). The simulation demonstrated a linear change regression between pressure and volume, which was compatible with the detected P-V loop (Figure 7).…”
Section: Mechanical Evaluation Of the Numerical Model Of The Left Ventriclesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…17,20,35 Cardiac magnetic resonance and imaging analysis Assessment of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and myocardial infarct (MI) size was performed by published standard cardiac magnetic resonance protocols adopted to porcine anatomy. [36][37][38]…”
Section: Pig Myocardial Infarction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46][47][48] Standardized CMR acquisition sequences were adopted to the porcine cardiac anatomy and utilized for the serial measurement of LVEF and LVMI size. [36][37][38] and the CMR analysis was blinded to the treatment type. LVMI size was quantified by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and, additionally assessed by global native T1-relaxation 2 weeks after experimental MI before study enrollment.…”
Section: Impact Of Raav5-hs100a1 On Cardiac Performance and Damage In...mentioning
confidence: 99%