2021
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive assessment of humoral response after Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination: a three-case series

Abstract: Objectives Since universal vaccination is a pillar against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), monitoring anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is essential for deciphering post-vaccination immune response. Methods Three healthcare workers received 30 μg BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Pfizer Vaccine, followed by a second identical dose, 21 days afterwards. Venous blood was drawn at baseline and at serial intervals, up to 63 days a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IgA production, by contrast, is induced in more modest quantities, comparable to what is seen in mild disease 11 . Induction of strong IgG and, low IgA levels in naïve patients after receiving one of the two mRNA vaccines has also been recently reported in other independent studies 42 . Serum IgA levels are not a direct measure of secretory IgA levels, since systemic IgA are predominantly made of monomeric IgA1 subclass, and mucosal IgA is a polymeric IgA2 subclass 43 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…IgA production, by contrast, is induced in more modest quantities, comparable to what is seen in mild disease 11 . Induction of strong IgG and, low IgA levels in naïve patients after receiving one of the two mRNA vaccines has also been recently reported in other independent studies 42 . Serum IgA levels are not a direct measure of secretory IgA levels, since systemic IgA are predominantly made of monomeric IgA1 subclass, and mucosal IgA is a polymeric IgA2 subclass 43 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This suggests that, even though the vaccine alone did not generate an optimal B.1.1.7 neutralization response (compared to natural infection), it was capable of boosting the full cross-neutralization response pre-established by natural infection, in line with other reports [27,28]. Importantly, vaccinated individuals were all sampled at least 7 days after the second dose of vaccine, at a time when both humoral and neutralizing responses have reportedly reached a plateau [29,30]. However, another study suggests that the kinetics of neutralization following vaccination might vary depending on the variant [31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…To this end, the identification of subjects with low/modest postvaccine immune response will be vital for limiting the potential unfavorable impact of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants (especially those bearing the so-called "immune escape mutations"), ensuring adequate personal and community immune protection and limiting viral circulation, thereby reducing the risk that novel and even more dangerous mutations will accumulate [30][31][32]. Moreover, recent evidence of a sustained IgA response after mRNA-LNPs vaccination [33], combined with clinical observations of decreased viral load in the limited number of reported cases after inoculation [34], suggests that these vaccines can reduce viral replication, which itself would result in decreased likelihood of new mutation generation in the case of asymptomatic/symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection of a vaccinated individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%