PsycTESTS Dataset 2004
DOI: 10.1037/t13733-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive Aphasia Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
475
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(484 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
475
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were screened on the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT; Swinburn, Porter & Howard, 2004) writing to dictation subtest. A score of between 10% (3/28) and 90% 11 (25/28) of letters correct was required for entry into the study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were screened on the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT; Swinburn, Porter & Howard, 2004) writing to dictation subtest. A score of between 10% (3/28) and 90% 11 (25/28) of letters correct was required for entry into the study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JP also had a relatively low score on the CAT copying task (Swinburn et al, 2004), indicating impairment in peripheral writing skills, which can be an indicator of a poor response to writing treatment (Beeson. Rising & Volk, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting observation was that where there was flexibility within therapy tasks, participants may often initiate strategies and make proactive use of their processing strengths to find ways of enhancing and maintaining spelling accuracy. CAT: Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn, Porter & Howard, 2004). *Non-aphasic performance: mean = 32.19 (SD = 11.72), range = 18-66; Post-acute aphasic performance: mean 6.32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations