2014
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive annotation of splice junctions supports pervasive alternative splicing at the BRCA1 locus: a report from the ENIGMA consortium

Abstract: Loss-of-function germline mutations in BRCA1 (MIM #113705) confer markedly increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. The full-length transcript codifies for a protein involved in DNA repair pathways and cell-cycle checkpoints. Several BRCA1 splicing isoforms have been described in public domain databases, but the physiological role (if any) of BRCA1 alternative splicing remains to be established. An accurate description of 'naturally occurring' alternative splicing at this locus is a prerequisite to underst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
123
5
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
123
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data (up to 24 splicing events, including 4 predominant) suggest that BRCA2 is probably in the upper limit of an average locus for the number of alternate-splicing events. Yet, this is in contrast with BRCA1 , a genomic locus similar to BRCA2 in size (≈81 kb vs ≈84 kb) and number of exons (23 vs 27), but with a notable higher level of alternative splicing (up to 63 splicing events, including 10 predominant), according to a recent study conducted by the ENIGMA consortium with a very similar methodology 6. This difference may reflect the well-established link between protein disorder (a structural feature of BRCA1 but not BRCA2 proteins) and high levels of alternative splicing 22 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our data (up to 24 splicing events, including 4 predominant) suggest that BRCA2 is probably in the upper limit of an average locus for the number of alternate-splicing events. Yet, this is in contrast with BRCA1 , a genomic locus similar to BRCA2 in size (≈81 kb vs ≈84 kb) and number of exons (23 vs 27), but with a notable higher level of alternative splicing (up to 63 splicing events, including 10 predominant), according to a recent study conducted by the ENIGMA consortium with a very similar methodology 6. This difference may reflect the well-established link between protein disorder (a structural feature of BRCA1 but not BRCA2 proteins) and high levels of alternative splicing 22 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are of importance to the design and interpretation of mRNA splicing assays, construct-based or of patient material, that are commonly used to assess whether VUS leads to aberrations that are phenotypically equivalent to a molecular null (ie, a gene deletion). Recent studies have shown that detection of alternate splice events can be highly variable between laboratories and is quite sensitive to variations in cell types, cell growth conditions, mRNA preparation and RT-PCR methodology 5 6 24. Recommendations have been made to help make methodologies and reporting of alternate-splicing isoforms more uniform, including inhibition of NMD, sequence confirmation, proper primer design, presentation of data from at least 10 control samples of the same cell type to reveal potentially rare alternate splice isoforms, quantifying the variant allele contribution to full-length mRNA isoforms and quantifying the level of ‘aberrant’ transcripts relative to the full-length transcript 24.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with our observations, cancer and other diseases have been associated with dysregulated alternative splicing, including for several UGT genes. 12,13,15,[29][30][31] In addition, coordinated temporal control of alternative splicing has been recently documented for UGT2B7 in the kidney. 15 As extended read lengths were obtained with the use of pyrosequencing, and applied to pools of drug or hormone metabolizing tissues, our approach did not allow to quantitatively assess variant expression levels in specific tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%