2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive and Quality-Controlled Bedload Transport Database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compilation and threshold sites both represent samples of the global population of gravel rivers; however, the compilation provides a more complete picture of the variability within gravel rivers, while the threshold sites represent a smaller partial sample of the of the compilation's hydraulic geometry parameter space. The majority of the threshold field sites come from the study of Mueller et al (2005) with additional data compiled from the works of Recking (2010Recking ( , 2013, King et al (2004), and others (Andrews, 1994(Andrews, , 2000Andrews & Erman, 1986;Bunte, 1998;Erwin et al, 2011;Ferguson & Church, 2009;Hinton et al, 2017;Jones & Seitz, 1980;May et al, 2009;May & Pryor, 2013;McLean et al, 1999;Milhous, 1973;Mueller & Pitlick, 2014;Parker et al, 1982;Phillips & Jerolmack, 2014;Rankl & Smalley, 1992;Ryan et al, 2005;Ryan & Emmett, 2002;Smalley et al, 1994;Whitaker & Potts, 2007;Wilcock et al, 1996). The compilation data represent field measurements at bankfull conditions of slope (S), width (W, m), discharge (Q, m 3 /s), depth (H, m), and the median bed surface grain size (D 50 , m).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compilation and threshold sites both represent samples of the global population of gravel rivers; however, the compilation provides a more complete picture of the variability within gravel rivers, while the threshold sites represent a smaller partial sample of the of the compilation's hydraulic geometry parameter space. The majority of the threshold field sites come from the study of Mueller et al (2005) with additional data compiled from the works of Recking (2010Recking ( , 2013, King et al (2004), and others (Andrews, 1994(Andrews, , 2000Andrews & Erman, 1986;Bunte, 1998;Erwin et al, 2011;Ferguson & Church, 2009;Hinton et al, 2017;Jones & Seitz, 1980;May et al, 2009;May & Pryor, 2013;McLean et al, 1999;Milhous, 1973;Mueller & Pitlick, 2014;Parker et al, 1982;Phillips & Jerolmack, 2014;Rankl & Smalley, 1992;Ryan et al, 2005;Ryan & Emmett, 2002;Smalley et al, 1994;Whitaker & Potts, 2007;Wilcock et al, 1996). The compilation data represent field measurements at bankfull conditions of slope (S), width (W, m), discharge (Q, m 3 /s), depth (H, m), and the median bed surface grain size (D 50 , m).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficients and exponents of stream power equations representing bedload were derived from a database of 484 data sets containing over 15,000 measurements maintained by Brigham Young University [BYU data set (Hinton et al 2017)]. From this database, 74 data sets with a total of 5,634 measurements were identified to have adequate data necessary for this study.…”
Section: Data and Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the necessary data are not easy to collect, being based on measured sediment data across a broad range of flows, requiring time and effort. Researchers recently compiled and continue to build a publicly available database which should help future research overcome the relative data scarcity (Hinton et al, 2017), and the Rosgen River Database is currently under development. Second, SRCs are sensitive to the data collection methodology (bed load traps, samplers, etc.).…”
Section: Sediment Transport Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study sites were selected based on availability of the input data needed to implement both ACD and NCD in the modified CSR tool, drawing from existing literature (Hinton et al, 2017(Hinton et al, , 2018Williams & Rosgen, 1989) and supplemented with additional data from the Rosgen River Database. While the CSR tool accommodates both flow records and pre-existing FDCs (e.g., estimated by hydrologic models), for purposes of this study, we limited potential sites to streams with United States Geological Survey (USGS) gage records.…”
Section: Study Reachesmentioning
confidence: 99%