2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehensive analysis of high-throughput screens with HiTSeekR

Abstract: High-throughput screening (HTS) is an indispensable tool for drug (target) discovery that currently lacks user-friendly software tools for the robust identification of putative hits from HTS experiments and for the interpretation of these findings in the context of systems biology. We developed HiTSeekR as a one-stop solution for chemical compound screens, siRNA knock-down and CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out screens, as well as microRNA inhibitor and -mimics screens. We chose three use cases that demonstrate the potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De novo pathways identification [48][49][50] ; BioNet, 54 KeyPathwayMiner app in Cytoscape 55 and as a web app 56 Identifying drug targets in high-throughput screening 51 ; Robust disease subtyping 52 ; For phospho-proteomics analysis. 53…”
Section: Network Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De novo pathways identification [48][49][50] ; BioNet, 54 KeyPathwayMiner app in Cytoscape 55 and as a web app 56 Identifying drug targets in high-throughput screening 51 ; Robust disease subtyping 52 ; For phospho-proteomics analysis. 53…”
Section: Network Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples: BioNet was used for identifying de novo pathways implicated in Alzheimer's disease 48 and in diabetes. 49 KeyPathwayMiner was used for identifying potential drug targets in high-throughput screening, 51 for robust disease subtyping in breast cancer, 52 for phospho-proteomics analysis in epithelial-tomesenchymal transition, 53 and for detecting de novo pathways implicated in liver fibrosis. 50 Bayesian modeling.…”
Section: Stochastic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most pooled CRISPR screens have compared gRNA representation between two samples, it is also possible to have a multi-dimensional phenotypic readout, such as FACS-based sorting of multiple populations to determine relevant effect size or single-cell full transcriptome readout (Adamson et al, 2016; Datlinger et al, 2017; Dixit et al, 2016; Jaitin et al, 2016; Xie et al, 2017). Many different tools have been developed for analysis of gene-targeted screens and offer such features as automated determination of positively/negatively selected genes, pathway analysis, quality control analysis, and data visualization (Jeong et al, 2017; Li et al, 2014, 2015; List et al, 2016; Winter et al, 2016). …”
Section: Analysis Of Pooled Crispr Screensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several computational and statistical methods have been designed specifically for the analysis of MPRAs, focusing on methods for differential expression [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Myint et al [10] classified MPRAs into three broad categories: characterization studies [17,18,19], which examine and classify the sequence features of regulatory elements; saturation mutagenesis studies [4,20,21,22], which look at the impact of all possible mutations to a functional element; and differential analysis studies [23,24], which seek to determine the differential impact of multiple variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%