2007
DOI: 10.1080/13682820601084402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: does mental imagery training help?

Abstract: The findings demonstrate that a relatively short intervention in the use of mental imagery is an effective way to boost the story comprehension of children with specific language impairment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Kintsch and Rawson (2005), Joffe, Cain, and Maric (2007), and McGrew and Wendling (2010), text comprehension includes processing at various levels.…”
Section: Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Kintsch and Rawson (2005), Joffe, Cain, and Maric (2007), and McGrew and Wendling (2010), text comprehension includes processing at various levels.…”
Section: Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they have difficulty making inferences that link sentences and make texts cohere (Cain et al 2000), and they have difficulty in monitoring the sense of what they are reading and in using metacognitive strategies such as looking back on the text to resolve ambiguity. Against this backdrop, it is not surprising that many intervention studies have targeted higher level text comprehension skills such as making inferences (Yuill and Oakhill 1988, Yuill and Joscelyne 1988) as well incorporating the use of visual imagery to enhance the representation of text (Oakhill and Patel 1991, Joffe et al 2007). However, until recently the majority of intervention studies for poor comprehenders have been relatively small in scale and have not used random allocation of children to treatments.…”
Section: Interventions For Language and Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, , , Joffe et al . ), while others provided between 5 and 10 h of intervention (Ebbels , Ebbels et al . , Parsons et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%