2016
DOI: 10.1080/2050571x.2016.1187465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehension of narratives, non-fiction, and complex syntax as predictors of science achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of optimizing such instruction might be especially important for academic success. Indeed, Karasinski (2016) demonstrated that skill in evaluating syntax was uniquely related to understanding science texts, beyond other aspects of language skills. Similarly, instruction in syntax combined with that in scaffolding text structure was connected to improved understanding of academic texts (Reynolds, 2021).…”
Section: A Causal Connection For Syntactic Skills In the Development Of Reading Comprehension?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of optimizing such instruction might be especially important for academic success. Indeed, Karasinski (2016) demonstrated that skill in evaluating syntax was uniquely related to understanding science texts, beyond other aspects of language skills. Similarly, instruction in syntax combined with that in scaffolding text structure was connected to improved understanding of academic texts (Reynolds, 2021).…”
Section: A Causal Connection For Syntactic Skills In the Development Of Reading Comprehension?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, causeeffect passages appear more challenging for this population than other types of expository text, such as comparecontrast text. Individual differences in science achievement in eighth grade are associated with differences in use of complex syntax in written language (Karasinski, 2016). English Language Learners in 1 st -6 th grade exhibit a pattern in which gains in English support gains in science content learning (Stoddart, Pinal, Latzke, & Canaday, 2002& Canaday, 2002.…”
Section: Language and Science Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%