2021
DOI: 10.1177/02676583211037631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehension benefits of visual-gestural iconicity and spatial referencing

Abstract: Studies have shown that iconicity can provide a benefit to non-signers during the learning of single signs, but other aspects of signed messages that might also be beneficial have received less attention. In particular, do other features of signed languages help support comprehension of a message during the process of language learning? The following exploratory study investigates the comprehension of sentences in two signed and two spoken languages by non-signers and by American Sign Language (ASL) learners. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term "spatial iconicity effect" was created by [23] to describe the observation that while making assessments of semantic relatedness, readers often resort to mental simulations based on the iconic geographical placements of words. In Experiment 1, participants made snap decisions about the degree to which they were semantically related to pairs of terms like "car-road" displayed either in a geographically iconic alignment (car on the screen's top and street on the bottom) or in a noniconic alignment (car on the bottom of the screen and street on the top) (the road is at the top of the screen, and a car is at the bottom).…”
Section: Embodiment and Knowledge Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "spatial iconicity effect" was created by [23] to describe the observation that while making assessments of semantic relatedness, readers often resort to mental simulations based on the iconic geographical placements of words. In Experiment 1, participants made snap decisions about the degree to which they were semantically related to pairs of terms like "car-road" displayed either in a geographically iconic alignment (car on the screen's top and street on the bottom) or in a noniconic alignment (car on the bottom of the screen and street on the top) (the road is at the top of the screen, and a car is at the bottom).…”
Section: Embodiment and Knowledge Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%