1986
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1986.10806418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comprehending Spatial and Contextual Information in Picture-Text Instructions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there has been no previous theoretical work on knowledge maps, we have drawn on theories oriented toward the processing of statistical graphs (Pinker, 1985), geographical maps , and picture-text presentations (Bieger and Glock, 1986), as well as more general text processing theories (e.g., Kintsch, 1986) and theories of spatial cognition (e.g., Kosslyn, 1987).…”
Section: Preliminary Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there has been no previous theoretical work on knowledge maps, we have drawn on theories oriented toward the processing of statistical graphs (Pinker, 1985), geographical maps , and picture-text presentations (Bieger and Glock, 1986), as well as more general text processing theories (e.g., Kintsch, 1986) and theories of spatial cognition (e.g., Kosslyn, 1987).…”
Section: Preliminary Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the type of information conveyed in instructions for object assembly, Bieger & Glock [5,6] created a taxonomy of information categories used in picture-text instructions and subsequently tested performance on assembly tasks with variations of categories represented in pictures and text. Results indicated pictures were more effective for contextual information, whereas for spatial and operational information, there were either no differences between modality, or a speedaccuracy tradeoff.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual search of a visually known graphical target is a much less complex task than searching for a graphical object that matches a given verbal specification, even if only a part of the scene needs to be explored thanks to spatial verbal information. (Bieger and Glock, 1986) observed similar effects on the performances of subjects in an experiment that aimed at comparing the efficiency of text and graphics for presenting various types of information in instructional material. In particular, concerning spatial information 9 , Bieger and Glock found that subjects who were to use textual presentations of spatial information made fewer task execution errors than those who were given graphical presentations of the same information; on the other hand, the latter completed the prescribed tasks faster.…”
Section: P<00001mentioning
confidence: 58%