2021
DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compounding Effects of Social Vulnerability and Recurring Natural Disasters on Mental and Physical Health

Abstract: Objective: This study evaluated the relationships between the occurrence of recent and recurring natural disasters on the incidence of acute and chronic health outcomes at the census tract level in 500 cities across the United States between 2001 and 2015. Methods: Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 500 cities data set, the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, and the US Small Business Administration (SBA) Disaster Loan Database, we modeled the incidence of self-report… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found an emerging body of literature on the inequitable effects of multiple disaster exposures on physical health, mental health, and recovery processes at the community level. Hahn and colleagues 128 found that communities in the USA that had medium or high ratings on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (built from data on poverty levels, employment, educational attainment, and more) had the highest incidences of self-reported poor mental health, poor physical health, asthma, and high blood pressure after exposure to multiple disasters. Morgan and colleagues 121 found uneven trajectories of wellbeing and quality-of-life scores in the aftermath of the 2010 and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes in New Zealand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we found an emerging body of literature on the inequitable effects of multiple disaster exposures on physical health, mental health, and recovery processes at the community level. Hahn and colleagues 128 found that communities in the USA that had medium or high ratings on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (built from data on poverty levels, employment, educational attainment, and more) had the highest incidences of self-reported poor mental health, poor physical health, asthma, and high blood pressure after exposure to multiple disasters. Morgan and colleagues 121 found uneven trajectories of wellbeing and quality-of-life scores in the aftermath of the 2010 and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes in New Zealand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…82 Physical health 16 articles focused on physical health after multiple disasters. 75,76,79,80,[122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133] One study, which looked at 500 com munities across the USA, found that those who had experienced recurring disasters had increased incidences of asthma, high blood pressure, and self-reported poor mental health and poor physical health. Moreover, the incidence of all such outcomes increased with each additional year in which a community experienced a disaster.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple social vulnerability indices include race or ethnicity based indicators for social vulnerability which have been found to be good predictors of susceptibility to heat (21,22,26,32,37,44,46,58,72,95,98,111,116,119,(158)(159)(160)(161)(162)(163)(164). This is attributed to the history of structural disadvantage and discrimination faced by minority communities (111,112).…”
Section: Race Ethnicity Minority and Immigrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 ] Postdisaster increases in mental and behavioral health comorbidities, obesity, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, cardio-cerebrovascular disease, respiratory problems, diabetes, gastrointestinal diseases, chronic kidney disease, eye disease, arthritis, and others have been observed. [ 2 3 18 19 20 21 ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%