2022
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2022.3162689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compounding Approaches for Wind Prediction From Underwater Noise by Supervised Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Taylor et al [15] proposed random forest (RF) and CatBoost to predict wind and rainfall from hourly averaged noise spectra. RF [16], [17] was also used in [18] for rainfall detection from hourly averaged noise spectra, as well as in [19] for wind prediction. In the latter case, the averaging of predictions obtained from instantaneous noise spectra (i.e., prediction compounding) was adopted because it provided better performance than the traditional averaging of spectra (i.e., spectral compounding) before the prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, Taylor et al [15] proposed random forest (RF) and CatBoost to predict wind and rainfall from hourly averaged noise spectra. RF [16], [17] was also used in [18] for rainfall detection from hourly averaged noise spectra, as well as in [19] for wind prediction. In the latter case, the averaging of predictions obtained from instantaneous noise spectra (i.e., prediction compounding) was adopted because it provided better performance than the traditional averaging of spectra (i.e., spectral compounding) before the prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic data are synchronized with measurements of wind speed and rainfall intensity taken at the same location, using a sonic anemometer and a rain gauge mounted 10 m above sea level. This data set has already been used to predict hourly averages of wind speed and rainfall intensity [11], [15], [18], [19] by applying both empirical equations and ML techniques, in both cases without considering temporal memory. The best results for wind prediction are those reported in [19] where the RF regression [16], [17] and the average of consecutive predictions (namely, six predictions at 10-min intervals were averaged to yield the hourly average) were adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations