1974
DOI: 10.4064/cm-29-1-101-112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositions of confluent mappings and some other classes of functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also give some characterizations of these mappings and some examples. Theorems 3.8 and 3.9 generalize some earlier results in [10], and Theorems 3.17 and 3.18 are analogous to Theorem 2 in [16]. Composition, product and union properties are proved also.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…We also give some characterizations of these mappings and some examples. Theorems 3.8 and 3.9 generalize some earlier results in [10], and Theorems 3.17 and 3.18 are analogous to Theorem 2 in [16]. Composition, product and union properties are proved also.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It is known (see e.g. [32] and [40]) that a hereditarily indecomposable and weakly chainable continuum must be tree-like.…”
Section: Discussion and Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Moore's Plane Decomposition Theorem [Dav86], X is homeomorphic to C. Since f is confluent, it is easy to see that g is confluent. By a theorem of Lelek and Read [LR74] g is open since it is confluent and light (also see [Nad92, Theorem 13.26]). Since h and g factor the perfect map f through a Hausdorff space C, both h and g are perfect [Eng89, 3.7.5].…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%