Theory and Models in Vegetation Science 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4061-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
1,013
0
17

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 904 publications
(1,043 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
13
1,013
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…We used multidimensional scaling method (MDS) (Faith et al, 1987) for the samples ordination in a twodimensional graphic expressing the compositional similarity relationships between samples. The similarity matrix was calculated using Jaccard distance over a presence/absence dataset in order to retain only the information about community composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used multidimensional scaling method (MDS) (Faith et al, 1987) for the samples ordination in a twodimensional graphic expressing the compositional similarity relationships between samples. The similarity matrix was calculated using Jaccard distance over a presence/absence dataset in order to retain only the information about community composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the composition of hydrocarbons from eggs produced by females reared under SD and LD conditions from both temperate and tropical populations, peak areas from GC/MS output were quantified and converted to proportions and analysed using NMDS (Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling), a robust ordination technique (Minchin 1987). We used the proportion of each hydrocarbon to create a dissimilarity matrix among the following treatments using the BrayCurtis dissimilarity coefficient (Faith et al 1987): (i) LD versus SD samples from the temperate population, (ii) LD versus SD samples from the tropical population, and (iii) LD and SD samples from the temperate population versus LD and SD samples from the tropical population. We then tested for differences between treatments using ANOSIM (Analysis of Similarity, Warwick et al 1990) with 1000 permutations.…”
Section: (A) Est Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic distance for each pair of the accessions was calculated as the Manhattan metric. The genetic diversity within a group was evaluated by averaging the Manhattan metrics (Faith et al 1987). A UPGMA tree was constructed using the computer software R (http://www.r-project.org/).…”
Section: Aflp Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%