2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compositional and temporal stability of fecal taxon libraries for use with SourceTracker in sub-tropical catchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fast expectation–maximization microbial source tracking predicted that the largest fecal input in sites R1 to R6 was from human source under dry weather conditions, whereas a bovine or swine source was dominant during the wet season, in agreement with the analysis results using host-associated molecular markers. FEAST is a promising tool to detect low-level bacterial signatures of freshwater, which were similar to those obtained using SourceTracker ( O’Dea et al, 2019 ). FEAST analyses assigned the contamination of the river water samples collected during dry weather to human fecal signatures, comprising 0.34%–3.15% of the total bacterial community ( Figure 6 and Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…fast expectation–maximization microbial source tracking predicted that the largest fecal input in sites R1 to R6 was from human source under dry weather conditions, whereas a bovine or swine source was dominant during the wet season, in agreement with the analysis results using host-associated molecular markers. FEAST is a promising tool to detect low-level bacterial signatures of freshwater, which were similar to those obtained using SourceTracker ( O’Dea et al, 2019 ). FEAST analyses assigned the contamination of the river water samples collected during dry weather to human fecal signatures, comprising 0.34%–3.15% of the total bacterial community ( Figure 6 and Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For example, only a very small sample size was analyzed by the FEAST program and only fecal samples were included to build the “source” library. In this study, most microbial taxa in the sink did not match the fecal signature in the “source” library, thus being classified as unknown, as in the case of published studies using SourceTracker ( Newton et al, 2013 ; Staley et al, 2018 ; O’Dea et al, 2019 ). Therefore, more samples, especially potential sources near the sampling sites (e.g., soil and rainwater samples), need to be included in the “source” library if the composition of the unknown source is to be clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The identification of new markers is increasingly supported by advances in sequencing technology and bioinformatics [84,[94][95][96], and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MST approaches continue to be refined [97]. Although highly dependent on fecal library composition (the collection of metagenomic sequences from known fecal sources that informs source identification algorithms) [97][98][99][100][101], NGS-MST has the potential to identify finer distinctions between sources, as demonstrated by a study in Kenya that distinguished between fecal contamination from young children and adults [102•]. The recent introduction of more affordable and portable long-read sequencing platforms, while currently error prone, promises to accelerate the use of sequencing to characterize fecal contamination [103,104].…”
Section: Microbial Source Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diatom OTUs in our study were used as reference sequences to perform highthroughput sequence similarity searches using VSEARCH v.2.14.1 (Rognes et al, 2016) with minimum nucleotide identity cut-off of 97% (-usearch_global -id 0.97). This reference (Kaestli et al, 2019;O'Dea et al, 2019;Trevathan-Tackett et al, 2020 sequence based method streamlined the bioinformatics process and focused on the spatial distribution of the diatoms detected in our biofilm samples.…”
Section: Detection Of Selected Diatom Otus In Other Australian 16s Rrna Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A, 3B). The lowest number of diatoms ( 24) and lowest similarity was shared with the freshwater samples from Queensland (O'Dea et al, 2019).…”
Section: Occurrence Of Selected Diatom Otus In Other Australian 16s Rrna Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%