1970
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740210412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition of edible wild greens

Abstract: Eleven edible wild greens of West Bengal (Enhydra fluctuans, Hydrocotyle asiatica, Herpestis monneira, Oxalis corniculata, Mollugo spergula, Mollugo hirta, Cephalandra indica, Hygrophila spinosa, Amaranthus spinosus, Rumex vesicarius and Trianthema monogyna) were analysed for moisture, protein, fat, carbohydrate, ash, crude fibre, calcium, phosphorus, iron, nicotinic acid, ascorbic acid and calories. The nutritive value of the leaves of these species was generally low.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
4

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The moisture content is comparable to that of R. vesicarius (86.3%), reported by Sengupta and Pal (1970). However, the moisture content of the hummayd leaves is much higher than that of Nigerian sorrel leaf (76.0%), reported by Ladeji and Okoye (1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The moisture content is comparable to that of R. vesicarius (86.3%), reported by Sengupta and Pal (1970). However, the moisture content of the hummayd leaves is much higher than that of Nigerian sorrel leaf (76.0%), reported by Ladeji and Okoye (1993).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The protein concentrations were within the range from 17.1 to 20.1 g/100 g. The mean of protein (18.670.9 g/100 g) in the hummayd leaf is lower than that of the sorrel leaf (25.072.0 g/100 g) in Nigeria, reported by Ladeji and Okoye (1993). Also, the protein value is lower than the value reported by Sengupta and Pal (1970) for Indian sorrel leaf. The average protein value is within the range for most unconventional leafy vegetables (Shingade et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations