2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7sc02266b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition-driven Cu-speciation and reducibility in Cu-CHA zeolite catalysts: a multivariate XAS/FTIR approach to complexity

Abstract: Multivariate XAS analysis and in situ FTIR enable an unprecedented quantitative understanding of the composition impact on temperature-dependent Cu-speciation and reducibility in Cu-CHA zeolite catalysts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
197
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
21
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless Cu is present at levels exceeding the ion-exchange capacities of the particular SSZ-13 composition used, the current general consensus is that, in the freshly prepared specimens, Cu is present as isolated ions, including Cu 2+ balanced by two nearby framework negative charges (abbreviated as Cu 2+ -2Z, where Z represents a charged zeolite framework site) and a [Cu(OH)] + species balanced by one framework negative charge (as [Cu(OH)] + -Z) [17,[31][32][33]. It is also generally agreed, based on almost identical X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra with model Cu salt solutions, that these ions are fully solvated as [Cu(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+ and [Cu(OH)(H 2 O) 5 ] + complexes in hydrated ambient samples [20,34,35]. These two ions are, for practical purposes, spectroscopically indistinguishable and they reside in the Chabazite (CHA) cages where they have relatively small (i.e., longer range) interactions with the CHA framework.…”
Section: Transformations Of Cu Active Speciesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Unless Cu is present at levels exceeding the ion-exchange capacities of the particular SSZ-13 composition used, the current general consensus is that, in the freshly prepared specimens, Cu is present as isolated ions, including Cu 2+ balanced by two nearby framework negative charges (abbreviated as Cu 2+ -2Z, where Z represents a charged zeolite framework site) and a [Cu(OH)] + species balanced by one framework negative charge (as [Cu(OH)] + -Z) [17,[31][32][33]. It is also generally agreed, based on almost identical X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra with model Cu salt solutions, that these ions are fully solvated as [Cu(H 2 O) 6 ] 2+ and [Cu(OH)(H 2 O) 5 ] + complexes in hydrated ambient samples [20,34,35]. These two ions are, for practical purposes, spectroscopically indistinguishable and they reside in the Chabazite (CHA) cages where they have relatively small (i.e., longer range) interactions with the CHA framework.…”
Section: Transformations Of Cu Active Speciesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With the removal of H 2 O ligands, Cu ions now migrate to cationic exchange positions and bond to lattice O (O L ) of the zeolite framework. Such a change is well reflected by changes in unit cell parameters of the CHA substrate from X-ray diffraction (XRD) [27,35], -OH and H 2 O vibrations from FTIR [35], X-ray absorption and emission spectra (XAS and XES) [20] and hyperfine interactions between the unpaired electron and the nuclear spin of Cu(II) (I = 3/2) from electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [36]. It is now well-documented that in dehydrated Cu/SSZ-13, Cu 2+ -2Z with Cu ions located in windows of 6-membered rings (6 MR) are the energetically most favorable configuration.…”
Section: Dehydrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations