Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The sections in this article are We discuss the similarities and differences between liquid‐state electrochemistry (LSE) and solid‐state electrochemistry (SSE). Although based on the same thermodynamic principles, the properties of these cells are quite distinct. Differences exist in the bulk conduction mechanism, partially in electrode reaction and in cell construction and morphology. This also leads to differences in applications. Introduction Electrochemical Cell Geometry Cells Based on LEs Cells Based on SEs Comparing the Two Groups of Cells Charge Transport in Electrolytes Charge Transport in LEs Charge Transport in SEs Summarizing the Differences Between Transport in LEs and SEs Theoretical Current Voltage Relations for Ideal ECs (No Electrode Polarization) General Current Density Equations Half Cells Supporting Electrolyte Boundary Conditions Relations Between Open‐Circuit Voltage and the Nernst Voltage Chemical Diffusion Coefficient I – V Relations Methods for Characterizing ECs Methods for Characterizing LEs and SEs / MIECs Methods for Characterizing Elements in the EC Electrode Processes and Overpotentials General Inner ( G alvani) Electrical Potential Inner Electrical Potential in LSE Inner Electrical Potential in SSE I – V Relations for Charge‐Transfer Processes in LSE The Butler–Volmer Equation for an Elementary Step The Butler–Volmer Equation for Multistep Reactions I – V Relations for Charge‐Transfer Processes in SSE General Ion Transfer Electron Transfer Further Discussion of Ion and Electron Transfer Relating the Overpotential to a Difference in a Chemical or Electrochemical Potential Conclusions for Charge‐Transfer Processes Diffusion Galvani Potential Distribution versus Electrochemical Potential Distribution Heterogeneous Catalysis in SSE Summary
The sections in this article are We discuss the similarities and differences between liquid‐state electrochemistry (LSE) and solid‐state electrochemistry (SSE). Although based on the same thermodynamic principles, the properties of these cells are quite distinct. Differences exist in the bulk conduction mechanism, partially in electrode reaction and in cell construction and morphology. This also leads to differences in applications. Introduction Electrochemical Cell Geometry Cells Based on LEs Cells Based on SEs Comparing the Two Groups of Cells Charge Transport in Electrolytes Charge Transport in LEs Charge Transport in SEs Summarizing the Differences Between Transport in LEs and SEs Theoretical Current Voltage Relations for Ideal ECs (No Electrode Polarization) General Current Density Equations Half Cells Supporting Electrolyte Boundary Conditions Relations Between Open‐Circuit Voltage and the Nernst Voltage Chemical Diffusion Coefficient I – V Relations Methods for Characterizing ECs Methods for Characterizing LEs and SEs / MIECs Methods for Characterizing Elements in the EC Electrode Processes and Overpotentials General Inner ( G alvani) Electrical Potential Inner Electrical Potential in LSE Inner Electrical Potential in SSE I – V Relations for Charge‐Transfer Processes in LSE The Butler–Volmer Equation for an Elementary Step The Butler–Volmer Equation for Multistep Reactions I – V Relations for Charge‐Transfer Processes in SSE General Ion Transfer Electron Transfer Further Discussion of Ion and Electron Transfer Relating the Overpotential to a Difference in a Chemical or Electrochemical Potential Conclusions for Charge‐Transfer Processes Diffusion Galvani Potential Distribution versus Electrochemical Potential Distribution Heterogeneous Catalysis in SSE Summary
The electronic conductivity, σe, and the Hall coefficient, RH, of the high‐temperature phase of silver selenide, β‐Ag2+δSe, are experimentally determined at temperatures T between 170° and 300° and at values of σ covering the entire stability range. The change of composition is achieved and monitored by in situ coulometric titration. The electronic transport data yield the following results. The conduction band is harmonic, whereas the valence band is anharmonic. Mobility and relaxation time of conduction‐band electrons vary with temperature as T−1 and with the electronic energy as ϵ−1/2. This is the behaviour normally assumed to be valid, if the relaxation is due to the scattering of electrons by acoustic phonons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.