1987
DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19870910308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and thermochemistry of the equilibrium vapour of the systems NaI—FeI2 and NaI—PbI2

Abstract: The vaporization of NaI/FeI2 and NaI/PbI2 samples of equimolar composition was investigated in the temperature ranges between 574 to 683 K and 562 to 669 K, respectively, by using the mass spectrometric Knudsen effusion method. The gaseous species I. I2, Nal. (NaI)2 FeI2, (FeI2)2, FeI3, NaFel3, and Na2FeI4 (NaI—FeI2 system) as well as Nal, (Nal)2, PbI2, (PbI2)2, and NaPbI3 (NaI—PbI2 system) are present in the equilibrium vapours. The equilibrium partial pressures of these species were determined with the excep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probable overall errors of ⌬ r H 298 0 , ⌬ r S 298 0 and p in Tables II and III, due to statistical errors and estimated uncertainties, were calculated as described by Hilpert et al 19 The following probable uncertainties were assumed for the computation of overall errors: Ϯ5 K for the absolute error of the temperature measurement, Ϯ3 K at the lowest and ϯ3 K at the highest measurement temperature for the differential error, Ϯ18% for the pressure calibration constant, Ϯ10% for H Tm 0 ϪH 298 0 and S Tm 0 ϪS 298 0 , as well as Ϯ30% for the quotient of the ionization cross section used in the computation of the dimer partial pressure ͑Table III͒. Additionally, the uncertainties ͑in k Ϫ1 J mol Ϫ1 ͒ of Ϯ5, Ϯ10, and Ϯ12.6 were estimated for the ͓͑G T 0 ϪH 298 0 )/T] function of DyBr 3 ͑s͒, DyBr 3 ͑g͒, and ͑DyBr 3 ͒ 2 ͑g͒, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probable overall errors of ⌬ r H 298 0 , ⌬ r S 298 0 and p in Tables II and III, due to statistical errors and estimated uncertainties, were calculated as described by Hilpert et al 19 The following probable uncertainties were assumed for the computation of overall errors: Ϯ5 K for the absolute error of the temperature measurement, Ϯ3 K at the lowest and ϯ3 K at the highest measurement temperature for the differential error, Ϯ18% for the pressure calibration constant, Ϯ10% for H Tm 0 ϪH 298 0 and S Tm 0 ϪS 298 0 , as well as Ϯ30% for the quotient of the ionization cross section used in the computation of the dimer partial pressure ͑Table III͒. Additionally, the uncertainties ͑in k Ϫ1 J mol Ϫ1 ͒ of Ϯ5, Ϯ10, and Ϯ12.6 were estimated for the ͓͑G T 0 ϪH 298 0 )/T] function of DyBr 3 ͑s͒, DyBr 3 ͑g͒, and ͑DyBr 3 ͒ 2 ͑g͒, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(33,34) The statistical errors calculated from the experimental data are within 20.2 kJ·mol −1 for D r G°m(DyAl 3 Cl 12 , g), 20.7 kJ·mol −1 for D r H°m(DyAl 3 Cl 12 , g), and 21.0 J·K −1 ·mol −1 for D r S°m(DyAl 3 Cl 12 , g) within the temperature range T = (654 to 777) K, but may be doubled for D r G°m(DyAl 2 Cl 9 , g), D r H°m(DyAl 2 Cl 9 , g), and D r S°m(DyAl 2 Cl 9 , g) within the temperature range T = (803 to 847) K. The estimated probable uncertainties may result by assuming the absolute errors of the chemical analysis for Dy 3+ and Cl − as 20.5 per cent, of the volume measurement of the ampoules 20.5 per cent, and of the temperature measurement as 22.0 K.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ref. (14)]. The value ~H = 47 -+ 9 kJ mo1-1 is derived from the experimental enthalpy of dissociation of NaScI4(g) (Table II) and of the homocomplexes (NaI)~ ( 5) and (Sci3)2 ( 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-compartment Knudsen cell was the same as reported in Ref. (14). The effusion orifice had a diameter of 0.3 mm and a length of 2 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation