2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3536508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composition and strain in thin Si1−xGex virtual substrates measured by micro-Raman spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction

Abstract: Micro-Raman spectroscopy was employed for the determination of the germanium content, x and strain, , in ultrathin SiGe virtual substrates grown directly on Si by molecular beam epitaxy. The growth of highly relaxed SiGe layers was achieved by the introduction of point defects at a very low temperature during the initial stage of growth. SiGe virtual substrates with thicknesses in the range 40-200 nm with a high Ge content ͑up to 50%͒ and degree of relaxation, r, in the range 20%-100% were investigated using m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the different information depth probed by XRD and Raman, another reason is given by the fact that Raman results are model dependent and thus strongly rely on the accuracy of theoretically and experimentally derived parameters. 28 In particular, the cubic equation for ω GS lacks in precision since the respective Raman frequency value ω 0 for the relaxed alloy is extrapolated due to missing experimental values for x → 0 (Si rich samples). In contrast, the uncertainties of the elastic constant dependent parameters b Si , b SiGe , and b Ge have a negligible influence at such low strain values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the different information depth probed by XRD and Raman, another reason is given by the fact that Raman results are model dependent and thus strongly rely on the accuracy of theoretically and experimentally derived parameters. 28 In particular, the cubic equation for ω GS lacks in precision since the respective Raman frequency value ω 0 for the relaxed alloy is extrapolated due to missing experimental values for x → 0 (Si rich samples). In contrast, the uncertainties of the elastic constant dependent parameters b Si , b SiGe , and b Ge have a negligible influence at such low strain values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak position shifts under the presence of strain/stress and isotopic variations. 4,5,9,[27][28][29][30][31] Alloys of Si and Ge (Si 1-x Ge x ) typically show three Raman peaks of Ge-Ge (∼300 cm −1 ), Si-Ge (∼400 cm −1 ) and Si-Si (∼500 cm −1 ). The position and intensity of the three peaks depends on the composition of the alloys.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 For precise analysis, more careful interpretation is needed. Perhaps, additional information from XRD, SIMS, X-SEM and X-TEM results will be very useful, in early stages, for verification of Raman characterization results.…”
Section: Raman Characterization Of Ge(100)/simentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Si/Si 1-x Ge x nanostructures, a correlation between Si-Si, Si-Ge and Ge-Ge Raman peak positions, Ge content x and strain ε has been extensively discussed [19,20,25]. The relative number of chemical bonds comprising the Si-Si, Si-Ge, and Ge-Ge phonon modes are estimated as (1-x) 2 , 2x(1-x), and x 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Strain and Chemical Composition In Si/si 1-x Ge X Nanostructmentioning
confidence: 99%