2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74251-5_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Surrogate for Likelihood-Free Bayesian Optimisation in High-Dimensional Settings of Activity-Based Transportation Models

Abstract: Activity-based transportation models simulate demand and supply as a complex system and therefore large set of parameters need to be adjusted. One such model is Preday activity-based model that requires adjusting a large set of parameters for its calibration on new urban environments. Hence, the calibration process is time demanding, and due to costly simulations, various optimisation methods with dimensionality reduction and stochastic approximation are adopted. This study adopts Bayesian Optimisation for Lik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RF has been chosen for its robustness and scalability when compared to other machine learning models. Namely, RF performs well in cases of high-dimensional problems with limited dataset sizes, which is not the case with more advanced techniques like neural networks and deep learning [49], [65].…”
Section: The Surrogate Function and The Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…RF has been chosen for its robustness and scalability when compared to other machine learning models. Namely, RF performs well in cases of high-dimensional problems with limited dataset sizes, which is not the case with more advanced techniques like neural networks and deep learning [49], [65].…”
Section: The Surrogate Function and The Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the GP comes with a computation bottleneck when applied to high-dimensional problems, which in turn hinders a wider adoption for complex parameter spaces [37], [45]- [47]. Therefore, the straightforward adoption of the BO method in the calibration of activity-based models is hampered by the large number of parameters to be tuned [15], [49].…”
Section: B Bayesian Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%