2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite outcomes in 2.25-mm drug eluting stents: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technological development led to the introduction of 2.0 mm stents in order to accommodate for smaller vessel size, but the clinical benefit of small stent implantation (≤ 2.25 mm) is vague [55]. The new portfolio of 2.0 mm DES (everolimus-eluting Xience Xpedition SV or Xience Alpine; zotarolimus-eluting Resolute Onyx) created new options of PCI in a smaller vascular territory, with promising results in retrospective analysis [55,56].…”
Section: Bms and Desmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological development led to the introduction of 2.0 mm stents in order to accommodate for smaller vessel size, but the clinical benefit of small stent implantation (≤ 2.25 mm) is vague [55]. The new portfolio of 2.0 mm DES (everolimus-eluting Xience Xpedition SV or Xience Alpine; zotarolimus-eluting Resolute Onyx) created new options of PCI in a smaller vascular territory, with promising results in retrospective analysis [55,56].…”
Section: Bms and Desmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the TAXUS ATLAS (TAXUS Liberté-SR Stent for the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions) small vessel study, a thin-strut PES (97 mm) reduced the rate of 9-month angiographic restenosis and 12-month TLR compared with a thicker strut PES (132 mm)(46). Moreover, the availability of new generation DES with 2.25-and 2.00-mm diameters may further improve the feasibility and performance of coronary stenting in small vessels(47). Finally, new generation DESs have been associated with an improved safety and efficacy profile compared to early generation DES and DCB in different settings(41,48).Another finding of this network meta-analysis is that the use of BA for the treatment of small vessels should be avoided as this treatment resulted in the lowest ranking for all study outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%