2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite nonwoven separator for lithium-ion battery: Development and characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
91
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the largecapacity battery modulus claims more safety concerns, because fire or explosion at abnormal conditions may lead to serious hazards owing to the hidden peril of traditional liquid electrolyte system, i.e., lithium hexafluorophosphate solutions in aprotic organic solvents. This traditional liquid electrolyte system has been widely used in state of the art technology mainly owing to its high ionic conductivity (10 −3 -10 −2 S cm −1 ) at room temperature [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The use of a gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) in place of the liquid electrolyte may help to tackle safety concerns: (i) suppression of lithium dendrite growth that is usually caused by uneven currents when charged in the case of porous separators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the largecapacity battery modulus claims more safety concerns, because fire or explosion at abnormal conditions may lead to serious hazards owing to the hidden peril of traditional liquid electrolyte system, i.e., lithium hexafluorophosphate solutions in aprotic organic solvents. This traditional liquid electrolyte system has been widely used in state of the art technology mainly owing to its high ionic conductivity (10 −3 -10 −2 S cm −1 ) at room temperature [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The use of a gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) in place of the liquid electrolyte may help to tackle safety concerns: (i) suppression of lithium dendrite growth that is usually caused by uneven currents when charged in the case of porous separators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The porosity of cellulose/PSA (66%) was higher than that of PP separator (55%) indicating an enhanced permeability. 33 It was remarkable that the Gurley value of cellulose/PSA composite membrane (60 s) was much lower than that of PP separator (235 s). This result could be ascribed to the higher porosity and interwoven porous structure of cellulose/PSA membrane.…”
Section: ■ Results and Disscusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various approaches to overcome these shortcomings of polyolefin based separators have been reported. Most reports focused on many alternatives of polyolefin based separators such as non-woven separators and inorganic composite [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Another recent approach was the coating of polyolefin based separators using inorganic particles due to the excellent thermal stability and wettability of inorganic particles with organic electrolytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%