2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.86.085408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Majorana fermion wave functions in nanowires

Abstract: We consider Majorana fermions (MFs) in quasi-one-dimensional nanowire systems containing normal and superconducting sections where the topological phase based on Rashba spin orbit interaction can be tuned by magnetic fields. We derive explicit analytic solutions of the MF wavefunction in the weak and strong spin orbit interaction regimes. We find that the wavefunction for one single MF is a composite object formed by superpositions of different MF wavefunctions which have nearly disjoint supports in momentum s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

16
236
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(92 reference statements)
16
236
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because our systems hosts 4 instead of 2 MBS and thus hybridization of these levels lifts the crossing at E = 0 (see the SM for the full spectrum). As shown previously [1], the overlap of the γ 1 and γ 2 MBS scales as ∼ exp (−l 12 /ξ), with ξ the coherence length that, in the regime discussed in the work scales as ξ ∝ V z [39]. Second, the signal evolves from a double-peak structure for Zeeman fields near the topological phase transition (V z ∼ ∆ w s ), dominated by χ D (φ, ω), becoming a single peak around φ = π for larger Zeeman fields (V z ∼ 2∆ w s ), where it is dominated by χ N D (φ, ω) (for a comparison of the two contributions see SM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is because our systems hosts 4 instead of 2 MBS and thus hybridization of these levels lifts the crossing at E = 0 (see the SM for the full spectrum). As shown previously [1], the overlap of the γ 1 and γ 2 MBS scales as ∼ exp (−l 12 /ξ), with ξ the coherence length that, in the regime discussed in the work scales as ξ ∝ V z [39]. Second, the signal evolves from a double-peak structure for Zeeman fields near the topological phase transition (V z ∼ ∆ w s ), dominated by χ D (φ, ω), becoming a single peak around φ = π for larger Zeeman fields (V z ∼ 2∆ w s ), where it is dominated by χ N D (φ, ω) (for a comparison of the two contributions see SM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…37 The condition L≫ξ M cannot be fulfilled as the Zeeman field exceeds the critical value above the topological transition. If, on the other hand, we assume stronger SO couplings, ξ M saturates to ξ M ∼α/Δ, 16,36 which, for typical values of Δ, is still much larger than the SO length. For example, assuming a SO coupling ten times larger than before, α∼2 eVÅ, and a proximity gap Δ = 0.5 meV (of the order of the experimental one in ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incompressible regions are contours of constant ε eff F , 36 so that s = −gκ eff /g eff is a ratio between system's μ-compressibility κ eff ¼ @ε eff F =@μ, and the V Z -compressibility g eff =g ¼ @ε eff F =@V Z discussed above. While both are equal for μ < 0, κ eff becomes suppressed for μ > 0, so that s ≈ −1/(1 + (v/μ) 1/2 ) for a constant v∝V b 2 related to the interaction strength (see Supplementary Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sign reversal of spin and charge does not depend on boundaries of the system, and is thus independent of the presence of MFs. This provides an advantage over detecting the topological phase via the presence of MFs, which could either leak into the lead [45] or be masked by disorder effects [37][38][39][40]. To show that our results are robust against disorder, we add random on-site fluctuations to μ, 1 meV), N = 1200, and m = 0.015m e , with m e being the bare electron mass, for InSb nanowires (t = 10 meV, a = 15 nm).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%