2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite magnetic microspheres: Preparation and characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that composite From the hysteresis loops of CMMS (Figure 3), the saturation magnetization was 8.065 emu/g, coercivity was 76.05 Oe and retentivity was 1.057 emu/g. These results are in agreement with Zhanga Ji et al the magnetic properties of the composite magnetic microspheres were evaluated using a VSM [27].…”
Section: Results and Discusssionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results showed that composite From the hysteresis loops of CMMS (Figure 3), the saturation magnetization was 8.065 emu/g, coercivity was 76.05 Oe and retentivity was 1.057 emu/g. These results are in agreement with Zhanga Ji et al the magnetic properties of the composite magnetic microspheres were evaluated using a VSM [27].…”
Section: Results and Discusssionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Erika Aranas et al [26] prepared the spheres with technique similar to emulsion polymerization. Zhanga Ji et al prepared composite magnetic microspheres based on artemisia seed gum and chitosan using the suspension cross-linking technique for use in the application of magnetic carrier technology [27]. Their results showed that composite From the hysteresis loops of CMMS (Figure 3), the saturation magnetization was 8.065 emu/g, coercivity was 76.05 Oe and retentivity was 1.057 emu/g.…”
Section: Results and Discusssionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparation of magnetic microspheres [14]1% weight/ weight (W/W) chitosan (SHIN ERA TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, China) was dissolved in acetate buffer at pH 4.5 containing 2 mL of magnetic fluid [15] (35% weight/ volume (W/V)) ferrous sulfate solution mixed with 54% W/V ferric chloride solution, stirred and heated to 550C, then 36% W/V sodium hydroxide solution was added. The mixture was stirred for 30 minutes, and then 5 g of polyethylene glycol-10000 was added,Statistical analysis: The data analysis was performed using the SPSS-10 package (release 3, SPSS Inc., Chicago III) running on MCROVAX 3500.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aliquots were taken at different time intervals and percentage drug release analysed by UV Spectrophotometer at 230 nm (Zhang et al, 2007). Figure 14 represents the comparison of dissolution studies conducted on formulations F1, F2 and F3.…”
Section: Dissolution Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%