1989
DOI: 10.2514/3.10152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite laminate free-edge reinforcement with U-shaped caps. Part I - Stress analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where b is the curved laminate width, y/b = 1 represents the free edge for the untreated laminate and the boundary between CFRP and resin edge for the treated laminate. The use of edge caps [2][3][4][5] has also been shown to reduce interlaminar direct stress but not interlaminar shear stress. The caps consist of a C-shape that is clamped around the laminate at the free edge.…”
Section: Figure 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where b is the curved laminate width, y/b = 1 represents the free edge for the untreated laminate and the boundary between CFRP and resin edge for the treated laminate. The use of edge caps [2][3][4][5] has also been shown to reduce interlaminar direct stress but not interlaminar shear stress. The caps consist of a C-shape that is clamped around the laminate at the free edge.…”
Section: Figure 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high stress intensity caused by free edges has long been a known issue and there have been many techniques proposed to reduce it. Caps can be bonded onto the free edges and this has been shown to reduce interlaminar normal stress but does not significantly reduce interlaminar shear stress [2][3][4][5]. The edges can be altered to tailor structural properties, using an isotropic filler material and by changing the orientation of a ply near the free edge to reduce interlaminar stresses in this region [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delamination is the main failure modes for composite laminates which can suffer up to 60% reduction in stiffness and still remain visibly unchanged [2]. Researchers proposed several solutions to solve or mitigate delamination-related problems [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Carbon nanofibers/nanotubes (CNFs/CNTs) proved to be the most effective solution in terms of mechanical reinforcement [10][11][12], but their difficult mixing process with the resin [13] and serious risks for human health [14] make them unsuitable in many cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External loads, impacts, fatigue, deformations, and so on may induce plies to debond and thus the so‐called delamination phenomena, which is the most common failure mode for composite laminates. Several methods have been developed over the years to enhance the delamination resistance of advanced composite laminates .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%