2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite joints subject to reversal of loading—Part 2: analytical assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another difference between the two approaches is the definition of the height of concrete to be considered and, accordingly, the position of the centre of compression within the joint. In [4], the centre of compression is assumed to be at mid-height of the concrete slab while in [5], the following procedure is given to compute the position of this point:…”
Section: Proposed Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another difference between the two approaches is the definition of the height of concrete to be considered and, accordingly, the position of the centre of compression within the joint. In [4], the centre of compression is assumed to be at mid-height of the concrete slab while in [5], the following procedure is given to compute the position of this point:…”
Section: Proposed Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure which is described in this section combines two methods proposed respectively by Ferrario [4] and by Richard Liew [5]. The combination of these two methods permits to reflect in a more appropriate way how the concrete resists to the applied load in the vicinity of the joint.…”
Section: Fig 2 Concrete Slab In Compression In the Vicinity Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure which is proposed in this section combines results of two methods suggested by Ferrario [Ferrario 2004] and Liew [Liew et al 2004] respectively. The combination of these two methods permits to reflect in a more appropriate way how the concrete resists to the applied load in the vicinity of the joint.…”
Section: Design Models For Composite Joints Subjected To Sagging Momementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests were performed by , Dubina et al (2002) and Liew et al (2004) and are summarized in Table 5.…”
Section: Description Of the Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 in terms of energy dissipation and strength. In the tests performed by Liew et al (2004), the mode failure for joint 8 was excessive panel zone shear deformation and concrete crushing. The spalling of the white wash in the panel zone indicates extensive yielding of the column web.…”
Section: End-plate Joints 5 Tomentioning
confidence: 99%