2009
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2009.2022557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Common Spatial Pattern for Subject-to-Subject Transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliable classification of mental states while taking into account the change in data distribution between sessions and subjects (termed as transfer learning , Samek et al, 2013) has generated a considerable amount of interest among BCI researchers (Kang et al, 2009; Devlaminck et al, 2011; Samek et al, 2013). It allows the classifier to be trained on a fixed set of subjects and test it on a completely different set of subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reliable classification of mental states while taking into account the change in data distribution between sessions and subjects (termed as transfer learning , Samek et al, 2013) has generated a considerable amount of interest among BCI researchers (Kang et al, 2009; Devlaminck et al, 2011; Samek et al, 2013). It allows the classifier to be trained on a fixed set of subjects and test it on a completely different set of subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, determination of proper features and generalization of the classifiers is a must to tackle this issue. In the past (Kang et al, 2009; Lotte and Guan, 2010), researchers have averaged the covariance matrix of different subjects toward creating a generalized covariance matrix to improve the cross-subject estimation. Another approach (Devlaminck et al, 2011) toward transfer learning employed common spatial patterns to construct a common feature space among various subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atyabi et al (2013) specifically addressed the question of how to optimize the information from other subjects to the current subject played an important role in enhancing subject transfer. Kang et al (2009) attempted to apply the subject transfer to a subject with fewer training samples to generate a better set of subject-specific features. The authors emphasized that the data of other subjects having data distributions similar to each other alleviated the individual difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various feature extraction techniques have been used in the BCI literature such as common spatial pattern (CSP) [7,8], Fourier transform [9], wavelet transform [10], power spectral density analysis [11], filtering methods [12,13], polynomial coefficients [6], and autoregressive model [14,15]. Amid these techniques, CSP is one of the very widely used feature extraction techniques in motor imagery-based BCI applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the BCI competition III dataset IVa, which was recorded with 118 electrodes during the imagination of the right hand and foot. Their results showed that it was useful for cases where pretrained CSP features need to be adapted to a subject with a low number of training samples [8]. In another approach, Novi et al applied their method to the dataset IVa from BCI competition III, which recorded five subjects during the imagination of the left hand, right hand, and right foot movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%