2020
DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.921131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma; Small Cell Variant: A Real Diagnostic Challenge. Case Presentation and Review of Literature

Abstract: Rare co-existance of disease or pathology Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) both have a common origin arising from mature CD5+ B-lymphocytes. Their distinction is crucial since MCL is a considerably more aggressive disease. Composite lymphoma consisting of CLL/SLL and MCL has been rarely reported. This type of composite lymphoma may be under-diagnosed as the 2 neoplasms have many features in common, both morphologically and immunophenot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found out that LEF‐1 is a useful marker in cases of composite lymphomas (CL). In out cohort, we had a case of CL (CLL and Mantle cell lymphoma), 31 LEF‐1 expression by FCM had nicely separated the two different clones and served as an additional interesting tool to differentiate both types of lymphoma (Figure 2D); MCL clone (lambda restricted) and CLL clone (kappa restricted). The LEF‐1 MFI ratio for lambda restricted (MCL) clone was 1.4 which is (< cutoff value) while the LEF‐1 MFI ratio for kappa restricted (CLL) clone is 2.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found out that LEF‐1 is a useful marker in cases of composite lymphomas (CL). In out cohort, we had a case of CL (CLL and Mantle cell lymphoma), 31 LEF‐1 expression by FCM had nicely separated the two different clones and served as an additional interesting tool to differentiate both types of lymphoma (Figure 2D); MCL clone (lambda restricted) and CLL clone (kappa restricted). The LEF‐1 MFI ratio for lambda restricted (MCL) clone was 1.4 which is (< cutoff value) while the LEF‐1 MFI ratio for kappa restricted (CLL) clone is 2.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For V3J4 (R 2 < 0, 05; p > 0, 05)-changes in SOX11 expression are not associated with changes in V3J4 rearrangement marker highly specific for MCL. SOX11 expression is found in over 90% of MCL cases [3,20] and can be used as an MRD monitoring marker, as we previously reported [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A diagnosis of composite lymphoma of CLL and MCL (small cell variant), stage IV, MIPI score 4 was concluded, published case. [10]. Molecular analysis (conducted after publication) supports the presence of more than one B cell clone (Figure 3a,3b& 3c).…”
Section: Case 4: Composite Of Cll and MCLmentioning
confidence: 80%