1978
DOI: 10.3133/ofr78695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite aeromagnetic map of Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Continuation to a common flight level. This technique is the , most satisfying mathematically and was used by Sweeney et al (1978) in making a composite aeromagnetic map of Nevada. In , practice, this approach requires upward-continuation to the level of the highest survey.…”
Section: Composite Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Continuation to a common flight level. This technique is the , most satisfying mathematically and was used by Sweeney et al (1978) in making a composite aeromagnetic map of Nevada. In , practice, this approach requires upward-continuation to the level of the highest survey.…”
Section: Composite Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Continuation to a common flight level. This technique is the most satisfying mathematically and was used by Sweeney et al (1978) in making a composite aeromagnetic map of Nevada. In , this approac requires upward-continuation to the f the highest survey.…”
Section: Composite Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knapp's idea was a good one that might now be implemented with the help of computers. Some of the details of the F anomalies that do exist in the United States are shown in an Fanomaly map of the entire state of Nevada compiled by SWEENEY et al (1978). The computer file holding the anomaly values contains 841 rows and 721 columns equally spaced at 30-seconds-of arc in latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Spherical Harmonic Models Of the Earth's Main Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%